SAFE-T claim ID 95326-29975-3825907
Claim was opened because the item was shipped on time, delivered on time, shipped with Amazon buy shipping and the item was returned in used condition. The order had been placed with next day air shipping. The return was discretionary (no longer needed) Amazon initially approved the SAFE-T claim and reimbursed $4.15 but the total order amount was $66.50 with $41.94 of that being from next day air shipping. I appealed as the expedited shipping should have been reimbursed to us according to Amazon policy. The case history is listed below to show the frustrating lack of information in the investigators response.
Me --
Hello,
This order was ordered and shipped with expedited shipping. As the return reason for this order was "no longer needed" which is a buyer faulted return reason the outbound shipping to the customer should not have been refunded to the customer and been deducted from our account. Please fix this and credit us back for the expedited shipping fee from this order in addition to the refund already applied for the restocking fee for the item.
--------------------------------------
Response:
We have denied your reimbursement request for the order 114-4011758-8317001.
Reason:
The item for which you requested a reimbursement of the cost of the return label is eligible for free Returns.
Policy:
By offering free returns, you are unable to deduct the return shipping amount from the refund for in-policy returns, regardless of the return reason. In cases where no prepaid return label was offered and the buyer has shipped the item back, you are required to refund the return shipping amount to the buyer.
--------------------------------------
Me trying to clarify since they obviously didn't understand what the appeal was for:
Hello,
I am not requesting the return shipping be deducted. I am requesting the express shipping that was on shipping the order to the customer be refunded. The customer made the original order with next day air shipping. We shipped with next day air shipping at considerable cost. This should not have been refunded to the customer and should be returned to us.
--------------------------------------
Their response:
We have denied your SAFE-T claim for the order 114-4011758-8317001.
Reason:
There is no reimbursement due on this order.
--------------------------------------
I now requested an explanation:
Please provide a reason that you have refunded the next day air shipping charge to the customer from my funds. This does not follow Amazon policy. The order was shipped on time and delivered on time using Amazon buy shipping. The order was returned by the customer for a customer faulted return reason. The express shipping should not have been refunded to the customer.
--------------------------------------
This is their response:
We have reviewed the information that you provided and we have denied your appeal for the order 114-4011758-8317001.
We understand that you may not agree, however, we stand by our decision.
--------------------------------------
According to policy if I repeatedly appeal SAFE-T claims without providing new information it will be used as a negative mark against my account. In this case the investigator handling this SAFE-T claim appears to be incompetent and is not providing any justification for denying my appeals even though the appeals are clear cut.
@Seller_RSwABJNHpHnEZplease help and also let me know if there's some way I can word these kinds of appeals that will connect better with SAFE-T claim investigators as this isn't the first time this has happened and I have just given up in the past on some cases like this.