Urgent: Buy Box Still Not Restored, No Sales for Days, Request Permanent Removal of Abnormal Signal
1. Scenario
I sell a long running branded product on Amazon UK using FBA. For years the listing held the Featured Offer consistently. Starting in late February this year, the listing began repeatedly losing the Featured Offer due to price competitiveness signals. When the Featured Offer disappears, sales drop sharply and advertising and promotions become ineffective.
2. What triggered the issue
The first time the Featured Offer disappeared coincided with Pricing Health flagging the offer as ineligible due to a Competitive External Price threshold. From that point, the eligibility would sometimes return after contacting support, then drop again within hours or a couple of days. The Competitive External Price threshold also moved down over time, which repeatedly retriggered ineligibility.
3. What Amazon showed me
Pricing Health and support messages repeatedly referenced “Competitive External Price” and “Competitive price threshold” and stated my offer was not eligible for Featured Offer because my total price was not competitive compared with external retailers.
The help documentation also states the threshold can be based on items customers may consider equivalent, even if the brand is different or generic, if attributes are near identical. It also states that for some online retailers, shipping may be excluded from the threshold calculation if customers could reasonably obtain the item without paying shipping.
Support also stated they cannot disclose the competitor, the data source, or algorithm details, and they cannot guarantee Buy Box retention because eligibility changes dynamically based on market price changes.
4. What I already tried
Opened multiple cases and provided screenshots showing repeated Featured Offer loss and the competitive external price values at the time of loss.
Requested escalation to Pricing Health and Featured Offer teams and asked for root cause analysis and a lasting fix.
Investigated possible low price sources, including cross marketplace offers in another Amazon marketplace where the same listing appears with multiple third party offers.
Attempted Brand Registry enforcement against those external low price offers. Some enforcement routes were blocked due to jurisdiction limits or because price itself is not treated as an IP violation.
Attempted Report a Violation for copyright image misuse. This was rejected when my “link to copyrighted content” pointed to the same product detail page, because the infringement relationship was not clear to the tool.
Simplified pricing and promotions at times to reduce variables and observed whether eligibility stabilised. The issue still recurred.
5. Why this seems like a system, workflow, or policy problem
The competitive external price signal appears to be unstable for a single listing, with repeated resets and a downward trend over a short period, even though the product had a multi year stable history.
The impact appears isolated to one listing. Comparable active products in the same subcategory did not show the same pattern of Competitive External Price driven Featured Offer loss during the same period.
The policy allows “equivalent item” matching and possible shipping exclusion, which creates room for misclassification and overly aggressive thresholds in highly commoditised categories.
Support replies consistently point back to automated logic and do not provide a path to validate the match accuracy, the shipping treatment, or whether cross marketplace offers are influencing the signal.
Brand Registry and Seller Support workflows do not connect cleanly here. Even when you identify a suspected signal source, you may be unable to remove it for jurisdiction reasons, while the UK listing continues to be affected.
6. What I want to understand
How can a seller validate whether the Competitive External Price is coming from a true same item match or an equivalency match.
Whether shipping exclusion or VAT exclusive comparisons can materially change the threshold in ways that look unreasonable on the UK offer side.
Whether cross marketplace Amazon offers can influence the UK Competitive External Price threshold, even though the definition refers to retailers outside Amazon.
What practical steps exist to stabilise eligibility when the signal appears to be unstable for one listing.
7. Question for other sellers: has anyone seen the same pattern or found a workaround?
Have you experienced repeated Featured Offer loss driven by Competitive External Price for a single listing, especially with a threshold that keeps moving downward over time while similar products remain unaffected?
If yes, what actually worked in practice?
Urgent: Buy Box Still Not Restored, No Sales for Days, Request Permanent Removal of Abnormal Signal
1. Scenario
I sell a long running branded product on Amazon UK using FBA. For years the listing held the Featured Offer consistently. Starting in late February this year, the listing began repeatedly losing the Featured Offer due to price competitiveness signals. When the Featured Offer disappears, sales drop sharply and advertising and promotions become ineffective.
2. What triggered the issue
The first time the Featured Offer disappeared coincided with Pricing Health flagging the offer as ineligible due to a Competitive External Price threshold. From that point, the eligibility would sometimes return after contacting support, then drop again within hours or a couple of days. The Competitive External Price threshold also moved down over time, which repeatedly retriggered ineligibility.
3. What Amazon showed me
Pricing Health and support messages repeatedly referenced “Competitive External Price” and “Competitive price threshold” and stated my offer was not eligible for Featured Offer because my total price was not competitive compared with external retailers.
The help documentation also states the threshold can be based on items customers may consider equivalent, even if the brand is different or generic, if attributes are near identical. It also states that for some online retailers, shipping may be excluded from the threshold calculation if customers could reasonably obtain the item without paying shipping.
Support also stated they cannot disclose the competitor, the data source, or algorithm details, and they cannot guarantee Buy Box retention because eligibility changes dynamically based on market price changes.
4. What I already tried
Opened multiple cases and provided screenshots showing repeated Featured Offer loss and the competitive external price values at the time of loss.
Requested escalation to Pricing Health and Featured Offer teams and asked for root cause analysis and a lasting fix.
Investigated possible low price sources, including cross marketplace offers in another Amazon marketplace where the same listing appears with multiple third party offers.
Attempted Brand Registry enforcement against those external low price offers. Some enforcement routes were blocked due to jurisdiction limits or because price itself is not treated as an IP violation.
Attempted Report a Violation for copyright image misuse. This was rejected when my “link to copyrighted content” pointed to the same product detail page, because the infringement relationship was not clear to the tool.
Simplified pricing and promotions at times to reduce variables and observed whether eligibility stabilised. The issue still recurred.
5. Why this seems like a system, workflow, or policy problem
The competitive external price signal appears to be unstable for a single listing, with repeated resets and a downward trend over a short period, even though the product had a multi year stable history.
The impact appears isolated to one listing. Comparable active products in the same subcategory did not show the same pattern of Competitive External Price driven Featured Offer loss during the same period.
The policy allows “equivalent item” matching and possible shipping exclusion, which creates room for misclassification and overly aggressive thresholds in highly commoditised categories.
Support replies consistently point back to automated logic and do not provide a path to validate the match accuracy, the shipping treatment, or whether cross marketplace offers are influencing the signal.
Brand Registry and Seller Support workflows do not connect cleanly here. Even when you identify a suspected signal source, you may be unable to remove it for jurisdiction reasons, while the UK listing continues to be affected.
6. What I want to understand
How can a seller validate whether the Competitive External Price is coming from a true same item match or an equivalency match.
Whether shipping exclusion or VAT exclusive comparisons can materially change the threshold in ways that look unreasonable on the UK offer side.
Whether cross marketplace Amazon offers can influence the UK Competitive External Price threshold, even though the definition refers to retailers outside Amazon.
What practical steps exist to stabilise eligibility when the signal appears to be unstable for one listing.
7. Question for other sellers: has anyone seen the same pattern or found a workaround?
Have you experienced repeated Featured Offer loss driven by Competitive External Price for a single listing, especially with a threshold that keeps moving downward over time while similar products remain unaffected?
If yes, what actually worked in practice?
2 replies
Manny_Amazon
Hello @Seller_obeJAMszmR5WM,
Thanks for posting regarding your issue. I've reviewed the details of case #12385217482 and have confirmed it is currently open with the team who is reviewing and providing updates. Please allow the team time to review this and get back to you with an update. If you see that the case resolves later and still need help, let me know here and I'll look into seeing what options exist for escalation.
Regards,
- Manny