This does not read like a seller who has skipped process. It reads like a seller who has followed multiple Amazon-directed routes and been sent in a loop between teams.

The key issue here seems to be that there are really two separate questions:

• Who is entitled to verify brand ownership and product detail page control for these ASINs?

• Which team has authority to actually reverse the incorrect brand ownership / listing contribution once the abuse is identified?

From your timeline, the seller has already been routed through:

• Report Abuse → Ticket 12205412252

• Brand Registry → Case 12343207812

• Seller Support → Case 12352404502

So the problem is no longer lack of reporting. The problem is that each channel is redirecting without resolving the underlying ownership dispute on the detail pages.

The contradiction is quite clear:

• the seller says they are the Brand Registry owner and manufacturer

• a third party is allegedly asserting false brand ownership

• Amazon acknowledges the issue enough to keep redirecting it

• but no team is taking end-to-end ownership of verification and correction

That suggests a catalogue abuse / ownership verification case trapped in a support boundary problem, not a simple “use another reporting form” issue.

Could a moderator @NR_Amazon please escalate this directly to the Catalog / Product Detail Page Abuse or equivalent internal team that can:

• verify the ASIN contribution history for B0G6SV9PY2, B0FP79NQBW, and B0G6SV3J6D

• confirm which account is asserting brand ownership

• compare that against the Brand Registry record

• and confirm which team is authorised to amend the detail pages where a false ownership claim exists

At this stage, sending the seller back to Report Abuse or back to Seller Support would just repeat the same failed loop.

Thanks.