Seller Forums

Results for "문의탤그 banonpi 대학생대출가능한곳 회선당9만원소액내구제 바넌피선불유심내구제 수원시내구제정심매입업체 긴급생계대출지원"

(271 results)
Update your preferences for improved recommendations
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
user profile
Seller_AJVL4eyKUPo5h
user profile
Seller_2dkaDwZY8gVgf
user profile
Seller_ltotxmbMKiVuO
user profile
Seller_2PJJEd2rbDKIb
user profile
Seller_tFx5glRVZd6uz
user profile
Seller_bBzTN961283JR
user profile
Seller_8juBc2rMZBARd
replied
user profile
Seller_l2MgDEPkoSAOB
replied
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "문의탤그 banonpi 대학생대출가능한곳 회선당9만원소액내구제 바넌피선불유심내구제 수원시내구제정심매입업체 긴급생계대출지원"

(271 results)
Update your preferences for improved recommendations
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
user profile

Hi everyone,

I am posting this after receiving an unhelpful reply from Seller Support, because I wanted to investigate the issue myself and see whether anyone else has seen the same behaviour.

I have two different parent listings with FBA child SKUs.

What I found is:

under one parent, the FBA child SKUs show quantity fields as 0

under another parent, the FBA child SKUs show quantity fields as either 9 or 0

These displayed numbers do not match the actual FBA inventory quantities.

I tried changing all the child rows showing 9 to 0.

When I checked again more than two hours later, those rows were still showing 9.

So from my side, the edit to 0 did not persist. I do not know whether the system rejected the change immediately or accepted it and then restored 9, but either way the page did not keep the value I entered.

I then inspected the pages in browser developer tools.

On the parent page where quantity appears, the live DOM contains a numeric input with an ID pattern like:

fulfillment_availability#1.quantity

and kat-aria-label="Quantity".

On the other parent page, the child rows do not expose that same quantity structure in the live DOM. Instead, I can see fields such as colour, external product ID, external product ID type, price, and condition note, but no fulfillment_availability.quantity field in the same inspected row.

So the two parent pages do not seem to be rendering the same child-row structure.

My questions are:

Why would one parent load child rows with a fulfillment_availability.quantity field while another parent does not?

Why would FBA child SKUs show values such as 9 or 0 when those values do not match real FBA stock?

Why does an entered change from 9 to 0 not persist?

Could this be caused by hidden fulfilment logic or a mismatch between FBA and merchant-fulfilled row models?

I am a small seller, not an engineer, so I should not need to inspect HTML just to understand why Amazon is showing quantities that do not match inventory and do not keep my edits.

Has anyone else seen this?

Case ID: 12219284542

0 votes
0 votes
47 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
user profile

Hi all, I’m hoping someone can explain what’s happening here (or point me to where to check the root cause).

Scenario

I have an existing variation parent with some FBA SKUs already active.

When I add new variations to the parent, I sometimes see a “Quantity” box appear on the product page / variation selection.

That quantity box often shows either “9” or “0” for the existing FBA variations.

Those numbers do not match my actual FBA inventory in Seller Central.

What I’m seeing

Sometimes the quantity box appears, sometimes it doesn’t (for the same parent listing, depending on when I check).

When the quantity box is hidden, the newly added variations default to FBA (even before I’m fully confident everything has synced correctly).

When the quantity box is shown and displays 9 or 0, it seems to create a channel confusion:

Buyers appear to be selecting an FBA offer/inventory, but the order can go through as FBM (or the listing behaves like FBM at checkout).

I’m worried this could lead to late shipment / cancellation risk and performance impact.

Questions

What does the “Quantity” box on the variation page actually represent?

(Is it a cached number, a per-offer purchase limit, a “available” estimate, or something else?)

Why would it show fixed values like 9 or 0 that don’t match Seller Central inventory?

Why does the quantity box appear/disappear intermittently? Is this an A/B test or different page template?

When adding new variations, is there a known sync delay where the fulfillment channel (FBA vs FBM) can temporarily mismatch between:

Manage Inventory / FBA inventory

Offer listing

Detail page variation UI

Checkout fulfillment path?

Where can I check logs/reports to confirm what Amazon thinks the offer is at the moment of purchase?

(e.g., Inventory Event Detail Report, Manage FBA Inventory reserved, Listing Quality/Offer tab, etc.)

What I’ve tried / checked

Verified actual FBA stock in FBA inventory pages (quantities are different from the 9/0 shown).

Issue happens right after adding variations (most noticeable during the first hours/day).

If anyone has seen this, I’d really appreciate:

what the 9/0 usually indicates,

how to prevent buyers ordering the “wrong channel,”

and what to tell Seller Support (keywords, screenshots, which report to attach) so they don’t give a generic answer.

Thanks in advance!

0 votes
0 votes
22 views
6 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_AJVL4eyKUPo5h
user profile
amazon 9 days hold on funds
by Seller_AJVL4eyKUPo5h

Does anyone know a company that pays out a % of our Amazon funds so we can keep a good stock amount in Amazon? The fund hold has slowed down our business as we lose sales, and all our orders are tracked, and our average order value is around £10, so it's not like high risk

0 votes
1 vote
166 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_2dkaDwZY8gVgf
user profile
Missing units from 9 AWD to FBA shipment plans
by Seller_2dkaDwZY8gVgf
Amazon replied

Hi,

I'm using AWD and recently seen 2,050 units go missing across 9 shipment plans.

These were auto-replenishment shipments, with Amazon being responsible for creating the shipment plans, physically packing and shipping the goods.

As an example (FBA1905Z2G1Y), a plan was created with 200 units. The 'shipping events' tab shows that the goods were delivered and then checked in. Yet, the 'contents' tab shows 0 units located (which beggars belief as to what was delivered/checked-in?!).

Amazon has rejected claims (example case ID: 18664925041) for investigation/reimbursement with this message: "We are denying your reimbursement claim for the below items because we received unexpected items when compared to your shipping plan. This can be caused by sending items with different UPCs than expected, or putting the item in a different box than planned."

If Amazon send products with a different UPC or a different box, then they are responsible for that, not us.

I'm not able to provide a Proof of Delivery, since it was Amazon themselves who made the shipment.

What is the correct procedure to get this properly investigated?

CC @Seller_hme3Wbydd1ihr @Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP

Thanks!

Keith

1 vote
0 votes
140 views
5 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ltotxmbMKiVuO
user profile
FBA Listing Stuck as Defective for 9 Weeks
by Seller_ltotxmbMKiVuO
Amazon replied

Hello,

I’m hoping an Amazon moderator may be able to help, as I’ve been unable to get this issue resolved through normal Seller “Support” - and I’m hoping you may be able to step in somehow. If any of you lovely sellers have any ideas too, I’d be forever grateful!

Since early September, one of my FBA listings has been incorrectly marked as defective/unfulfillable, and the new stock is being returned - even though the items are brand new and not defective in any way, either in the product itself or the packaging. The ASIN listing is showing as unsellable on my dashboard. For context, I only sell in the UK marketplace, so there’s no complication with cross-market ASINs.

I’ve repeatedly explained to Support that this appears to be a barcode or catalogue mapping issue following a previous barcode merge (although the merge was over two years ago), as the return slips are listing the old barcode, so hence my thought that is is to do with the barcode. Despite my constant contact with support and repeatedly requesting escalation - every reply is the usual cut and paste saying the issue is “being worked on by an internal team,” with no timeline or resolution or that it could be another issue entirely. I’m just not getting anywhere.

It has now been almost nine weeks with no progress, so this is my last resort.

Could a member of the Amazon forum moderation team please help ensure this is sent to the correct internal specialists for escalation and resolution? This delay is seriously affecting my sales… and my sanity!

Thank you.

Case ID: 11500746572. Status: Work in progress

@Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP @Seller_Huz6FT08OxHAR @Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN @Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV @Seller_z3k8APxGfbQEK @Seller_TSXM2A5nxWSuH

2 votes
0 votes
23 views
4 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_2PJJEd2rbDKIb
user profile

Still Ongoing: 9 INR Claims This Week — All for £4.99 Items, All Demanding Refunds

@Seller_WIFV02H2XUFgS

This is just a reminder (because Amazon clearly needs constant reminders) that INR fraud is still rampant — and getting worse.

In the last 7 days alone, we’ve had 9 new “Item Not Received” claims, every single one following the same lazy pattern:

“Item not arrived, refund me now.”

No politeness. No hesitation. Just blatant exploitation of Amazon’s soft-touch refund system.

These aren’t high-value items. They’re £4.99 seed packets — small, lightweight envelopes sent via Royal Mail 2nd Class, using postage labels bought directly from Amazon. There’s no tracking. Buyers know this. And they’re clearly being tipped off by Amazon’s ridiculous “your item may be lost” emails.

We’ve reached a point now where we no longer treat these as simple customer service issues — because they’re not. They’re theft, plain and simple.

As of today, we are issuing 16 Letters Before Action to customers making these fraudulent claims. Enough is enough. If Amazon won’t protect sellers, we’ll protect ourselves — through the courts if necessary.

Again, for the record:

  • On our own website, UK non-deliveries: 1 in 2,000
  • International orders from our site: 1 in 1,650
  • On Amazon? Now 1 in 30, and 1 in 12 some days.

It’s very clear what’s going on here — and it’s not a postal issue. It’s customer fraud, enabled by Amazon’s policies and reinforced by your communications.

We’ll keep posting. We’ll keep pushing. And we’ll keep holding this platform to account, until something changes.

8 votes
0 votes
47 views
17 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_tFx5glRVZd6uz
user profile
+9-10 days delivery is a punishment!
by Seller_tFx5glRVZd6uz

AMAZON +9-10 days delivery is a punishment!

Sales have stopped because Amazon have increased our delivery times from 3-4 days to 9-10 days.

What did our company do to deserve this you ask?

We are FBM and use 'Buy Shipping' purchased through Amazon, in our case Royal Mail 2nd Class and 2nd Class 'Signed For' letters, always dispatched on time. Account health good. On checking it appears three 'Signed For' were delivered late by Royal Mail. Failure to deliver on time can happen to any business regardless of delivery service and is beyond the control of the seller.

So we now have two-tier delivery system, as an example –

Seller A pays for Royal Mail 2nd class letter through Amazon (buyer quoted delivery 2-4 days)

Seller B pays for Royal Mail 2nd class letter through Amazon (buyer quoted delivery 9-10 days)

There is clear disparity here.

Why has Amazon implemented a policy that punishes a seller for something beyond their control?

There is nothing I can do to stop an item being delivered late in the future, so no doubt I and other sellers will be punished over and over again. From a small business perspective if this policy remains I will be unable to rely on the Amazon platform to sell through, you cannot plan or run a business with the constant threat of little or no orders due to bizarre Amazon rules and zealotry. Business is hard enough as it is.

This Amazon policy is egregious, ill thought through and ultimately unfair for small businesses.

@Julia_Amazon

@Spencer_Amazon

@Simon_Amazon

@Abella_Amazon

@Dougal_Amazon

1 vote
0 votes
283 views
8 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_bBzTN961283JR
user profile

I have been trapped in a vicious cycle with one listing for over two months that I cannot seem to break out of, despite multiple escalations.

Here is exactly what keeps happening, over and over again:

Amazon's automated pricing health system flags my listing as uncompetitively priced and removes my Featured Offer

I provide proof showing my pricing is correct and justified

Amazon reviews it, agrees my pricing is compliant, and restores my Featured Offer

Amazon's same automated pricing health system flags the exact same listing again for the exact same reason

Repeat — this cycle has now happened nine times in two months

The core problem is that Amazon's algorithm is benchmarking my fully personalised, individually laser-engraved, made-to-order product against generic non-personalised products. Every time a human at Amazon reviews it they agree the comparison is invalid and restore my Featured Offer. But the automated system never gets corrected and keeps triggering the same flag again.

This has been escalated to specialist teams, partner teams, and the Managing Director's Escalation Department. Multiple internal investigations have confirmed my pricing is compliant. Yet the automated system keeps overriding those findings and removing my Featured Offer regardless.

My Featured Offer is currently inactive again and the cumulative damage to my sales rank and revenue over two months is severe.

Relevant Case IDs: 12311440552, 12212512732, 12100552052, 12160617902

I would really appreciate a Community Manager's help in breaking this cycle permanently.

Thank you.

0 votes
0 votes
62 views
8 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_8juBc2rMZBARd
replied
user profile

Worth noting that OTDR is based on number of units sent NOT number of orders.

For example, if you receive one order for 9 items and then 9 orders for one item each, the order for 10 items goes late but all 9 of your other orders get there on time, your OTDR will be 50% (9/18) not 90% (9/10).

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
4 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_l2MgDEPkoSAOB
replied
user profile

Same thing for me. But Ive been stuck for over 9-10 months

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
7 replies
Latest activity