Seller Forums

Results for "탤래문의 tsbusim 선불유심내구제20만원 탬스뷰선불유심내구제 옥천군무직자생계비대출 50만원비상금대출 신분증소액급전대출내구제"

(1036 results)
Update your preferences for improved recommendations
user profile
Seller_coYkgVClAKm0i
∙
user profile
Seller_iiHSdsVeiRryj
∙
user profile
Seller_22OoXWKuckv6R
∙
user profile
Seller_CWjCR0J2agCt3
∙
user profile
Seller_WDZn7M87F9oD7
∙
user profile
Seller_Hx4Av3yEAbQGY
∙
user profile
Seller_dOiQTiNwFBWw1
∙
user profile
Seller_hgJm5OoaarBh4
∙
user profile
Seller_Y0ydmxdE8ED0y
∙
user profile
Seller_VSGPEORb4yGqN
∙
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "탤래문의 tsbusim 선불유심내구제20만원 탬스뷰선불유심내구제 옥천군무직자생계비대출 50만원비상금대출 신분증소액급전대출내구제"

(1036 results)
Update your preferences for improved recommendations
user profile
Seller_coYkgVClAKm0i
∙
user profile

Hello,

@Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob, I’m disappointed with the outcome of this reimbursements and would appreciate your assistance to this.

The records show multiple inventory disposition changes, and all affected units were reimbursed at only 50% of the approved sourcing cost.

These units were sent to Amazon in new and sellable condition and were not damaged or unsellable before being sent. We also used an Amazon Partnered Carrier for the shipment. The units were subsequently damaged during the Amazon distribution/fulfilment process.

It was mentioned that the 50% reimbursement applies when a unit was already in an unsellable condition prior to the warehouse damage event. However, that does not appear to apply in this case, as the units were sellable before being sent to Amazon and the damage occurred within Amazon’s fulfilment network.

Reimbursement IDs: 9074539152, 9075038812, 9074538262, 9073821812, 9073821162

ASIN: B00FL0P27A

1 vote
0 votes
8 views
0 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_iiHSdsVeiRryj
∙
user profile
3 of 20 Vine reviews just inexplicably disappeared
by Seller_iiHSdsVeiRryj
Amazon replied

Hello Amazon community support. I’m writing as 3 of my 20 Vine reviews just inexplicably disappeared. This is frustrating as they had gone through the moderation process and had been showing on my listing for some

time. Is this a glitch that will correct? Will I be refunded the fulfilment fees I paid to Amazon to send out these free units as part of your programme? Very disappointing and undermines trust in the Amazon system.

1 vote
0 votes
224 views
8 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_22OoXWKuckv6R
∙
user profile
FBA Fee for stock units under £20
by Seller_22OoXWKuckv6R
Amazon replied

Any sellers that have stock units under £20. After payment settlement my fee's are over 50% of all sales this amount just appears outragous?

If any sellers can help with this or if there is something that can be done to reduce these fees. I have seen there is an enrolment fee of £25 to lower costs yet whenever i try to enrol i get a error page, secondly trying to talk to Amazon support is almost impossible or generic replys.

0 votes
1 vote
227 views
5 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_CWjCR0J2agCt3
∙
user profile

Hello Amazon Moderators,

I am requesting assistance with a long-running FBA inventory investigation that has now remained unresolved for over six weeks.

50 units of one FNSKU were originally recorded as SELLABLE, later moved through WAREHOUSE_DAMAGED, and ultimately reclassified as DISTRIBUTOR_DAMAGED.

Seller Support confirmed that a physical inspection request was submitted to fulfilment centre STN6 on 21 July 2026.

Amazon later confirmed that:

- all 50 units remained physically recorded at STN6;

- the fulfilment centre was unable to inspect them because they were in the damage-processing area;

- there was a significant backlog;

- the case had been escalated;

- a firm inspection timeline had been requested.

However, as of 1 September, I still have no inspection result, no photographs, no damage findings and no firm timeline. The latest response simply states that Amazon is still researching the issue with the responsible team.

The 50 units have therefore remained commercially unusable for more than six weeks without a final determination.

I am not requesting a general explanation of Distributor Damaged or non-partnered carrier policy. I am requesting a final physical inspection and disposition decision:

1. If the units are undamaged, restore them to SELLABLE.

2. If damage occurred under Amazon’s control, apply the correct disposition and reimbursement.

3. If Amazon maintains that the units arrived damaged, please provide the inspection findings or other evidence supporting that determination.

Case ID: 13056278822

For privacy reasons, I have not posted the ASIN, FNSKU, shipment ID or transaction IDs publicly, but I can provide all of these details privately to an Amazon moderator.

Could an Amazon moderator please review the existing case and escalate it to the appropriate FBA Inventory / Fulfilment Centre Operations team for final resolution?

Thank you.

0 votes
0 votes
17 views
2 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_WDZn7M87F9oD7
∙
user profile

Our Amazon UK seller account has been deactivated following an Intellectual Property issue.

Since the deactivation, we have submitted more than 20 revised Plans of Action, making changes each time based on guidance received from Account Health Support.

However, the appeals continue to be rejected with essentially the same response:

“Insufficient detail on the root causes” and “insufficient details on the steps taken to prevent infringement going forward.”

We have already taken significant corrective and preventive action and have submitted supporting documentation, including supplier invoices and evidence of the changes implemented.

Our main difficulty is that we are not being told specifically what remains insufficient. We have also spoken with Account Health on numerous occasions and have received different guidance on what is required.

We do not want to continue submitting different versions of the POA without understanding what is actually missing.

Has anyone experienced a similar situation and managed to get a case-specific review rather than another standard rejection?

If an Amazon Forum moderator sees this discussion, we would really appreciate assistance in having the case reviewed or escalated to an appropriate senior team. We are happy to provide the full case history and supporting information privately if required.

0 votes
0 votes
20 views
3 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_Hx4Av3yEAbQGY
∙
user profile
Amazon replied

Dear Amazon Tax Exemption Team,

We are contacting you regarding tax charges applied to eligible business purchases made before our tax exemption approval was fully completed on Amazon.

I have VAT exempt status and previously applied for a refund on orders that were charged VAT before my exemption was granted. The system indicated a wait time of 20 business days, but that period has now passed and I still have not received my refund. Please help me resolve this and process my VAT refund.

Our tax exemption has now been approved and activated on the account. However, during the review / appeal period, several eligible orders were charged tax even though the purchases were made for our exempt business/resale activity.

We respectfully request a review and refund of the tax amounts charged on the eligible orders

@Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP @Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN @Seller_hnDMgUKxMh1V4

0 votes
1 vote
501 views
14 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_dOiQTiNwFBWw1
∙
user profile

Hi,

Does anyone has the same problem, my VTR was always 100 %, I sent to Germany from UK, all orders below 20 euros and use Royal Mail , normal letter. From the drop down menu I choose Royal Mail and the other drop down menu royal mail 2nd class stamp. Up to now al was fine , but for the last 2 weeks all the orders sent like this was counted like non exempted and counted against my VTR , anyone can shed some light on it? Maybe you had a problem and managed to solve it ? or you choose something else from drop down menu?

0 votes
0 votes
25 views
4 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_hgJm5OoaarBh4
∙
user profile

Hello,

I need help with a UK VAT Establishment verification that has been open since 20 August 2026.

Our company is UK-established. Our business information and UK director have already been successfully verified, and there are no VAT/GST registration numbers on our Seller Central account because we are not VAT registered.

However, Amazon still treats our account as Non-Established and has been collecting VAT from every UK order since 21 August.

The specialist case remains under review with no clear explanation of what is still outstanding.

Could an Amazon moderator please review this case or escalate it to the UK VAT Establishment / Tax verification team?

Thank you.

1 vote
0 votes
193 views
20 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_Y0ydmxdE8ED0y
∙
user profile

I am only receiving bot responses to my SAFE-T appeals, that fire back generic responses within a couple of minutes each time.

In short - customer returned item as "no longer needed" 51 days after purchase. Amazon gave full refund at first scan.

Item had been torn apart and used. 20% of product (a glue) used/missing and returns shipping label stuck to product so all the packaging is trashed too. Pretty clear cut case.

Images and the most concise of explanations were submitted in claim. Amazon granted only 20% of the claim value. They listed reason as "Amazon damaged", which is incorrect as the order was fulfilled by merchant and returned directly to us.

Spoke to Amazon on the phone but they say SAFE-T can only be discussed via the claim messaging box (where I'm getting the bot responses).

How do I challenge the reimbursement amount?

I will add - I have asked them specifically, "why was I only granted 20% of the claim value?" and "why was the reason listed as Amazon damaged when order was FBM?", but all they will say is:

We have reviewed the information that you provided and have denied your reimbursement request for the order X. We understand that you may not agree. However, we stand by our decision.

0 votes
0 votes
73 views
5 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_VSGPEORb4yGqN
∙
user profile
And, after over 20 years, it's time to go.
by Seller_VSGPEORb4yGqN

When I started on here, you could pretty much list anything you wanted (within reason). The biggest problem back then was the lazy seller who did the minimum amount of work to put up the listings.

Then Scamazon started asking for information about where we were getting the products, and you could not get a listing done without giving them a supplier. They were just stealing information from sellers for their own ends (something Amazon are brilliant at).

Christmases were incredibly busy (and profitable). Until they weren't. The year they introduced PPC was a disaster. I spent everything on stock for the busy period, only it didn't come. I was left with thousands of pounds of stock, rent, business rates... bla bla bla.

Next was the cut-out the middle man stage where the suppliers stopped supplying us because they were selling directly on Amazon. All these companies who we had bought from and made successful just screwed us over.

Anyway, the changes keep coming, none of them good for sellers, always good for Amazon.

I'm utterly sick of it. Sick of all the Amazon supported scammers, sick of waiting 3 weeks to get paid, sick of all the stress.

I wish all you good, honest, hardworking seller all the best, but I'm not giving this dishonest, morally bankrupt company another penny, or a second of my time.

Goodbye!

:-)

121 votes
3 votes
3.6k views
68 replies
Latest activity