Seller Forums
Sign in
Sign in
imgSign in
imgSign in

Results for "ᚌhttps://t.me/ Ac_mIrv4uXI5ZDAxᚌ『딥러닝 영상 복원『⑁얼굴 합성기⑁δ딥페이크 대응 소프트웨어δφAI 음성 분석 툴φ"

(311 results)
user profile
Seller_RAXEWLxQ2dbmN
replied
user profile
Seller_ZQ5QYhioq8N7u
replied
user profile
Seller_tz5M9iHaTDZFk
replied
user profile
Seller_M2Il1yiayMfjp
replied
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
replied
user profile
Seller_2PJJEd2rbDKIb
user profile
Seller_cTMW3klxGb1Um
replied
user profile
Seller_76AUwmqvSyRIM
replied
user profile
Seller_DVSaJqhO2jDNU
user profile
Seller_ZVX3qG6y9UPuF
Sort by
Latest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "ᚌhttps://t.me/ Ac_mIrv4uXI5ZDAxᚌ『딥러닝 영상 복원『⑁얼굴 합성기⑁δ딥페이크 대응 소프트웨어δφAI 음성 분석 툴φ"

(311 results)
user profile
Seller_RAXEWLxQ2dbmN
replied
user profile
Book Condition
by Seller_RAXEWLxQ2dbmN

Most likely specualtive dropshippers who list millions of titles they don't physically possess in the hope that they can source one as and when they get a sale.

I'm nost sure about the one from Amazon US - does Amazon itself source from 3rd party sellers on amazon.com?

If you check the 'other editions' link, you will see even more 'new' offers under cloned ASINs at exorbitant prices:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Death-Long-Grass-Capstick-Hathaway/dp/B00GGVAJ6W

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Peter-Hathaway-Capstick-Author-Death/dp/B01DHN9WW8

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Death-Long-Grass-Adventures-Hardcover/dp/B00M0L5VGU

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Capstick-Peter-Hathaway-DEATH-GRASS/dp/B00NBKU8CQ

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Death-Capstick-Hathaway-Author-Hardcover/dp/B017QLI6P6

etc &c

The catalogue is absolutely riddled with this rubbish.

2 votes
0 votes
0 views
12 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZQ5QYhioq8N7u
replied
user profile

Open AI:

1 Principal Place, London, EC2A 2FA is a real and legitimate address. It is the UK headquarters of Amazon. The building is located in Shoreditch, London, and Amazon has occupied it since around 2017.

The Legal Department of Amazon UK may indeed be based at that address, especially for official correspondence or legal matters.

So if you've seen this address in relation to Amazon.co.uk or its legal team, it's authentic.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
15 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_tz5M9iHaTDZFk
replied
user profile

If this is of any help, we have the same issue. Error 8541

This, I was able to elevate to the MD email. The answer was that I needed to update the UK listing (ie the source listing) using a flat file and update the product category. It's our best seller and I am loathe to do it but I will be trying.

There are various similar threads on here. One solution was checking coo (country of origin) making sure this was 'Great Britain' (not 'UK') which worked for someone(not me!)

Another was here, which seems sound to me: https://sellercentral-europe.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/a4ca63c7-e393-42ef-9578-5d0f0d327159?postId=a4ca63c7-e393-42ef-9578-5d0f0d327159

Good Luck.

Can I ask, did you get your fee issue sorted out (PAN EU v EFN) please?

We have the same issue. We are food, we were approved for PAN EU and now we are not, so our fees are higher.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
9 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_M2Il1yiayMfjp
replied
user profile
Amazon Customer Product Reviews
by Seller_M2Il1yiayMfjp

@Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN I have not created a case as I just get the generic / robotic same responce as I always do , Im not even sure if its a human responding or automated software

I have reported this racist review several times on the methods you have suggested and its not been removed

I do not see what the point is I have basically Identified hundreds of reviews thats against amazon policy and they not not actually get looked at

Im assuming amazon doesnt have anybody and they are using AI software

I can provide u with a list of 100 reviews that all go against amazon policy Ive already suppled these to the email in the OP but again no reply and nothing done

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
11 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
replied
user profile

Unfortunately due to the layer upon layer of teams and managers there is nobody to make a decision and everything just gets ignored and now with AI controlling everything the company is being eaten away from the inside, at the moment I estimate that about 50% of all products in the catalogue have either been removed or are unsaleable due to errors.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
14 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_2PJJEd2rbDKIb
user profile

This issue has not gone away, and it’s causing constant stock and financial losses for us—and many other sellers too, from what I can see across the forums.

Amazon is still marking orders as “lost in transit” and reimbursing customers, even when the customer has actually received the item. Some honest buyers are even taking the time to message us:

"I have received the item but it says it's been lost."

"Just wanted to let you know that I received the seeds, thank you."

These customers didn’t need to contact us—but they did. Why? Because they were surprised that Amazon claimed the package hadn’t arrived. And meanwhile, we as sellers get hit: our stock is deducted, the order marked as “lost”, and we're not paid.

This creates a toxic environment. We're being conditioned to view all buyers with suspicion—wondering if they’re trying to game the system. That’s not how good customer relationships are built. We want to trust our customers, but this situation is making it increasingly difficult. It leaves a bitter taste and pushes sellers toward treating every order as a potential scam. We have to save all

We only sell chilli, tomato and sunflower seeds, and when we first started on Amazon, we used to go the extra mile—sending customers freebies with their orders, hoping to build trust, earn great reviews, and share the joy of growing. But now? We’ve had to stop all of that. With so many unjustified refunds and losses, we now only send exactly what was ordered—nothing more, nothing less. That generosity has been stripped away because Amazon’s system has made it too risky to trust.

To make matters worse, we use Royal Mail 1st and 2nd Class Letter services, which are untracked, as allowed under Amazon’s guidelines for low-value, lightweight items. But here’s the absurd part: Amazon cannot track these shipments—yet they’re somehow notifying customers that the item is “lost”.

How can Amazon determine that a parcel is lost on a service that has no tracking data?

This kind of automated assumption is fuelling unnecessary refunds, stock loss, and seller frustration. Amazon is essentially undermining its own sellers based on zero evidence.

And on top of that, we now have to manually save every Royal Mail label outside of Amazon, because Amazon deletes them after 30 days. If a claim is raised later, we’re left with no proof unless we’ve downloaded and stored it ourselves. That’s a significant, time-consuming admin burden just to defend ourselves from a flawed system.

We’ve flagged this repeatedly, and it’s clearly not an isolated issue. See previous threads:

Original discussion here

https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/42c7dee7-231f-442f-9179-8813b57c6944

https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/a4542784-a28e-4866-a6f3-c575b40d31f9

https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/96f65b2a-63fb-43b6-8a9b-d2530dd1d61b

https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/c28eed23-2ee3-493d-acb8-08bd927c1534

This affects customer trust, seller trust, and shows a serious flaw in how Amazon handles logistics and order tracking.

We need Amazon to:

Investigate how and why these orders are marked as lost.

Review the tracking and reconciliation process.

Stop reimbursing customers for items they have received unless there’s clear evidence of non-delivery.

Provide sellers with better protection and compensation for lost stock.

Real numbers from our business

On our own webshop, using Royal Mail 2nd-Class Large Letter, our non-delivery rate is around 1 in 2,000 orders (0.05%).

On Amazon FBM, using the exact same postage, our non-delivery rate jumps to around 1 in 75 orders (1.3%).

That’s a 26× higher “lost” rate on Amazon—clearly driven by Amazon’s own messaging to customers, encouraging them to believe items are missing when they’re not.

43 votes
0 votes
500 views
27 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_cTMW3klxGb1Um
replied
user profile

Also see this discussion post if that helps you in any way:

https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/seller-forums/discussions/t/978c2af7-30c0-4358-8bad-802fcdd6cb75?postId=978c2af7-30c0-4358-8bad-802fcdd6cb75

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
7 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_76AUwmqvSyRIM
replied
user profile

AI answer from Google. I suggest you make further enquiries to verify it is complete and sufficiently comprehensive.

Sunglasses are generally required to meet standards for UV protection, lens quality, and safety. The CE mark indicates that sunglasses meet European safety requirements, and they should also offer full UV protection up to 400nm. Additionally, good quality anti-reflection and hard coatings are recommended to enhance lens performance and durability.

Here's a more detailed look at the requirements:

1. UV Protection:

UV400:

Lenses should block UV radiation up to 400 nanometers to protect against harmful rays.

CE Mark:

The CE mark signifies that the sunglasses meet European safety standards and offer adequate UV protection.

UV Protection Labels:

Look for UV400 labels or information brochures to confirm UV protection levels.

Lens Quality:

High-quality lenses, especially those cut instead of pressed, are important for clear, distortion-free vision and to avoid eye fatigue.

2. Lens Quality and Safety:

BS EN 1836:2005: Non-prescription sunglasses should meet this British Standard.

BS EN ISO 12312-1:2013: Prescription sunglasses should comply with this standard.

Anti-Reflection Coating: A good quality anti-reflection coating can reduce glare and improve visibility.

Hard Coating: A hard coating protects the lenses from scratches and damage.

Impact Resistance: Sunglasses should be sufficiently impact resistant to protect eyes from potential injuries.

3. Driving and Peripheral Vision:

Clear Vision: Sunglasses should not be too dark, especially for driving, and should allow clear visibility.

Sufficient Light Transmission: Sunglasses should allow enough light to pass through for safe driving.

Peripheral Vision: Sunglasses with deep side arms or oversized frames can obstruct peripheral vision, which is not recommended for driving.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_DVSaJqhO2jDNU
user profile

Hi all,

Why are Outbound Shipping costs being refunded to Buyers who select a buyer-fault return reason? The Seller should have the option NOT to refund Outbound Shipping costs.

Our Buyer selected 'no longer needed' as the return reason, but has been refunded outbound shipping costs.

Our SAFE-T claim has been denied because 'The outbound shipping costs were charged in line with the refund policies. See https://sellercentral-europe.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/G202080050'. However, this link mentions nothing about the *Outbound* shipping costs

Why does SAFE-T refuse to reimburse the Outbound Shipping fees, when Buyer declares the return reason is 'no longer needed'?

Please can anyone help? Thanks :)

2 votes
2 votes
169 views
4 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZVX3qG6y9UPuF
user profile
Account Verification VAT
by Seller_ZVX3qG6y9UPuF
Amazon replied

Account Verification

I have not received a response to the e-mail I sent to vatsubmit@amazon.com

@Seller_DNQGSsdC7DccM @Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN @Seller_gAhPNiLrkfTcr @Seller_Huz6FT08OxHAR @Seller_hnDMgUKxMh1V4 @Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP @Seller_TSXM2A5nxWSuH @Seller_iTgjdgiRqiPsn @Seller_fgtTzyHQfOM1x @Seller_VJ4XoAkjDpjPH @Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4 @Seller_j9Bd91CW3ZVpr

Hello,

We’d like to inform you that your account requires additional verification.

We have noticed that the address provided in your Seller Central account or in the documents provided is used by a number of different companies as their registered address, hence, does not meet our establishment requirements.

As a result, your listings have been deactivated and your funds have been withheld in EU and UK marketplaces, while we work with you to confirm the actual address from which you operate your business. This is where you and your employees are physically present.

We have taken this decision in accordance with our Funds Disbursement Eligibility policy: https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/external/help.html?itemID=9RA9LYBJ3QP27M6

What actions do I need to take?

To reactivate your listings and disbursements, send the following three documents to vatsubmit@amazon.com:

1. A recent commercial invoice or utility bill issued to your business address. The utility bill can be a gas, water, electricity, TV, internet, mobile phone, or landline and must be dated within the last 180 days.

2. The last 3 VAT filings submitted to UK HMRC as downloaded from HMRC Online. These 3 VAT filings also must include the submission receipt reference.

3. Copies of your bank statements showing the corresponding payments or refunds to HMRC.

What happens if I do not take any action?

If you do not provide the required information, your listings and the ability to disburse funds will remain deactivated.

We’re here to help

If you have any questions, contact us at https://sellercentral-europe.amazon.com/help/hub/support

Sincerely,

Amazon Europe

0 votes
0 votes
11 views
1 reply
Latest activity