Seller Forums

Results for "내구제후기공유 탤레 Gora43430 고라통신 선불유심내구제 신불가능소액급전 전주시무작자당일소액급전 당일30만원급전지급"

(230 results)
user profile
Seller_5zI0wsS66MHFL
∙replied
user profile
Seller_0wilHOTx1Buop
∙
user profile
Seller_QBQ2XKqE9GpN5
∙
user profile
Seller_5znjUkXjvEGiQ
∙replied
user profile
Seller_tgkNyGEhdNzKP
∙replied
user profile
Seller_PHYfDU2WX4zEK
∙
user profile
Seller_vPTlUYc5NALmW
∙
user profile
Seller_nH1JV7emu7i90
∙
user profile
Seller_TufyJDtetbrlU
∙
user profile
News_Amazon
∙
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "내구제후기공유 탤레 Gora43430 고라통신 선불유심내구제 신불가능소액급전 전주시무작자당일소액급전 당일30만원급전지급"

(230 results)
user profile
Seller_5zI0wsS66MHFL
∙replied
user profile

Hi @Seller_DrFGGJ2znmIVI,

Thank you for posting.

If you haven't already, the most important next step is to file an appeal directly through your Seller Central account. You have 30 calendar days from the date the claim was granted to submit an appeal.

Important tip:

  • The appeal text box does not support attachments. If you need to attach documents such as signature from the customer (proof of delivery), use Buyer-Seller Messages to send them, and then reference those attachments in your appeal response.

As @Seller_sSxf9ltVoIMz9 shared in their comment, for "Not Received" claims, the single most critical piece of evidence you need is a signed Proof of Delivery (POD) — specifically, a customer signature confirming receipt. Without a signature from the buyer matching their name, it is extremely difficult to overturn a Not Received claim, regardless of what other evidence you may have.

That being said, I still do want to look at the details of this A to Z Claim. Please share us the Order ID so that a Community Manager can look into your issue.

Best Regards,

Ken

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
5 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_0wilHOTx1Buop
∙
user profile

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for advice from sellers who have dealt with FBA reimbursements, mandatory removals or incorrectly classified inventory.

I had 312 identical units of one product in Amazon FBA. Amazon has now disposed of 52 units, and I am extremely frustrated because I still have not received a clear explanation of why.

Here is the timeline:

1. May 5, 2026: Amazon says it sent a notification warning that the product required compliance documentation and that documents needed to be submitted to avoid deactivation.

I submitted the required compliance documents. The testing was Passed by CQC Intime Testing Technology Co., Ltd.

2. July 22, 2026: The compliance testing was completed successfully.

3. August 3, 2026: Amazon says it sent another notification stating that the listing was deactivated due to missing compliance documents and that I had 30 days to remove the FBA inventory, otherwise it would be disposed of at my expense.

I appealed and provided the required documents.

4. August 9, 2026: 52 units were placed in Defective status.

5. August 12, 2026: Amazon Support confirmed in writing that the listing was active and had no policy violations. I was also told that the offer was not appearing only because the inventory was out of stock.

From August onward, I contacted Seller Support repeatedly, often every 2–3 days, asking why these 52 units were Defective and how I could fix the problem. I was repeatedly told that the investigation was still ongoing and that I should wait.

September 22, 2026: Amazon says it initiated an automatic removal and destroyed the 52 units.

The biggest problem is that Amazon has given me different explanations:

- First, I was told the compliance documents had not been submitted. I provided proof that they had been submitted and passed, and Amazon confirmed that the listing was active and compliant.

- Later, Support mentioned possible label-related and detail-page defects, but could not provide any specific evidence or photos confirming these defects.

- Support also confirmed that the inventory report contains no specific reason explaining why these 52 units were classified as Defective.

So after almost two months of repeatedly asking for an explanation and being told to wait for the investigation, the inventory was simply destroyed.

I am now also being charged €554.32 for the disposal itself, separate from the value of the 52 destroyed units.

This has been extremely upsetting. I have been actively trying to resolve the issue for almost two months, but received very little information, and in the end my inventory was destroyed while I was still waiting for Amazon's investigation to be completed.

Amazon is now reviewing my reimbursement request.

Has anyone experienced something similar? How did you successfully challenge the disposal and obtain reimbursement when Amazon could not provide a specific documented reason or evidence for the Defective status?

I would really appreciate advice from experienced sellers.

0 votes
0 votes
24 views
2 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_QBQ2XKqE9GpN5
∙
user profile

Hoping other sellers have been through this, or that someone from Amazon can pick it up, because we are going round in circles!

What happened

We sell a 120-count dog waste bag product (FNSKU/ASIN B0FWD8CTKF) on Amazon UK. We were being charged the wrong FBA fees because of incorrect dimensions or weight on file. We first raised it on 18 May 2026. The remeasurement was logged and applied on 22 May 2026 at 16:46 BST (case 12597974352), so Amazon has effectively accepted the original data was wrong.

What we're owed

The incorrect fees ran across our orders from 16 December 2025 to 18 April 2026 alone (around 1,700 order lines and 1,758 units). The backdated difference we are claiming is £2,352.65. For context, many of these orders show a fee of £3.37 on a £5.50 item.

What's happened since

• We have supplied the order spreadsheet more than once, including when asked for affected order IDs.

• All remeasurements are complete and the correct fees are now applied. The only step left is the refund.

• Despite that, we keep receiving templated emails saying a remeasurement is under way, or that "no remeasurement has been performed" and "no fee adjustment is applicable". We have told support repeatedly that we are not asking for a remeasurement.

• We've been moved between cases, and chat agents have told us to wait for an email, wait 30 business days, or wait 24 hours after a transfer. None of those timeframes have produced a result.

• Today on 7 October, Amazon told us the fee difference would only be reimbursed for the last 90 days, not the full period. The very next reply ignored that entirely and just said an adjustment request is "already in progress".

Why this matters

Amazon's own data was wrong, and we were charged on it for months. Capping the refund at 90 days means we absorb the cost of Amazon's error. We have also had incorrect fees fixed quickly in the past, so this level of delay is out of character, which is why it's so frustrating.

What we're asking

1. A clear written answer on whether the full £2,352.65 will be reimbursed, and if not, the policy basis for the 90-day limit.

2. A named owner for this case, or an escalation path beyond front-line chat.

3. A realistic date for resolution.

If you've had a backdated FBA fee refund approved beyond 90 days, or know how to get this escalated properly, please share what worked. And if anyone from Amazon Seller Support is reading, our case ID is 13318312582.

Thanks.

0 votes
0 votes
4 views
0 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_5znjUkXjvEGiQ
∙replied
user profile

Thanks, that's really useful advice.

I've compared the genuine SFP orders against the orders that are coming through as non-Prime but still with a Next-Day delivery service.

Interestingly, it doesn't appear to be simply postcode, cut-off time or individual ASIN related. We have examples of the same ASIN producing both Prime and non-Prime orders within 30 minutes of each other. I've also found the same ASIN to the exact same postcode being Prime one day and non-Prime the next.

There is no real pattern to this. Whether this is an indication of more non-Prime buyers I don't really know, but something changed. Key factor for us comparing September to previous month there are 10 times more orders that are non-Prime coming through for us

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
9 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_tgkNyGEhdNzKP
∙replied
user profile

That pattern points at the buyer, not the offer. Amazon's own Seller Fulfilled Prime shipping settings page says the account-level handling time "applies to orders from Prime and non-Prime customers of your Seller Fulfilled Prime offers", so a non-member buying the same offer comes through as a non-Prime order. Same ASIN Prime and non-Prime 30 minutes apart, and the same postcode flipping day to day, is exactly what that looks like. The next-day service on those orders isn't a contradiction either: the Prime template groups regions as Prime and non-Prime and lets you set separate guaranteed dates for standard and Premium delivery, so a non-member can still buy a one-day promise off the same template. Before chasing it as an enrolment fault, check whether those orders carry a Prime-member buyer at all, and watch where they land in your metrics: your OTDR notice names Premium Delivery orders, not Prime orders, so non-Prime next-day orders are measured there. A case about the Prime badge won't move a premium-delivery metric, and a 10x jump in non-member orders would show up in exactly that bucket.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
9 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_PHYfDU2WX4zEK
∙
user profile

@Seller_FJwyF3iu5qxUY @Seller_Z6JEwkZB24rWj @Seller_WD80mtpYHjvBN @Seller_MjP2XhEPPzQTG @Seller_hwwu0taY2D6Xs @Seller_khUF6HPR2AHxu @Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN @Seller_YeWcEeTwlVO93 @Seller_PIHyltK09pbl3 @Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob @Seller_xkwDczt8sPSmx @Seller_CnfW62x6yxvJw @Seller_9Kb3jdNMszN2C @Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV @Seller_PIHyltK09pbl3 @Seller_ZMgYkp0cgrVoe @Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4@Seller_xkwDczt8sPSmx@Seller_8hQgfj6OVZYse@Seller_WIFV02H2XUFgS

Hello Amazon Moderator / Seller Support Team,

I am requesting assistance with an ongoing GB Restricted Products compliance appeal for the following listing:

• Case ID: 13076593322

• ASIN: B0H41WKNJZ

• Product: Puress Retainer Cleaning Tablets

• Original Removal Date: 23 July 2026

• Appeal Submitted: 1 September 2026

• Current Status: Work in progress / Repeated 10-day waiting period

---

### 1. Compliance Corrective Actions Completed

Following the original notification regarding CLP packaging labels and hazard details, we completed the following updates:

• Updated Packaging: Implemented revised packaging version PUR-120-V2 with applicable hazard pictograms, hazard statements, and precautionary statements.

• Documentation Submitted: Uploaded SDS, IFU (Instructions for Use), UK Declaration of Conformity, MHRA registration confirmation, and high-resolution packaging photos.

• Inventory & Backend Updates: Removed old FBA inventory and updated hazard/precautionary statements in Seller Central under Manage Inventory / Edit.

---

### 2. Technical Issue: Locked Detail Page / Synchronisation

While the updated compliance information is saved and visible in our Seller Central back end interface, it is NOT synchronising to the customer-facing detail page.

Because the listing was removed, the detail page appears to be locked/frozen, preventing our compliance updates from rendering publicly. We have uploaded screenshots verifying that the updates exist in our back end.

---

### 3. Case Stagnation & Repeated 10-Business-Day Responses

• 14 September 2026: Advised the review would take up to 10 business days.

• 30 September 2026: Reopened for a status update; received another standard response requesting an additional 10-business-day wait without substantive feedback.

Significant FBA inventory remains stranded due to this delay. We fully respect Amazon's safety and regulatory verification process, but we are stuck in an automated queue loop without confirmation of whether our documentation is complete or if a detail page refresh is required from the catalog team.

---

### Request for Escalation

Could a forum moderator please escalate Case 13076593322 to a senior Restricted Products / Compliance Specialist to confirm:

1. Whether our submitted documentation (SDS, IFU, MHRA, PUR-120-V2 packaging) is complete.

2. Whether the Restricted Products team can initiate a catalog/detail page refresh to push our back end compliance updates to the live listing.

3. If any specific outstanding items are still required from our side to finalise the reinstatement.

Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

0 votes
0 votes
12 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_vPTlUYc5NALmW
∙
user profile
OTDR Appeal
by Seller_vPTlUYc5NALmW

Unfortunately having to prepare an appeal (no individual ASINs deactivated) due to some recent low percentages on this metric, averaging I guess 60-70% over 30 days or so, so could really do with some solid advice and pointers.

So, the root causes. Part of it has been hitherto using cheaper and (as it’s turned out) more unreliable couriers myself (not using Buy Shipping presently), either picking up and/or delivering late (eg Evri and others) - but going forward at least they can be dropped/excluded and replaced now by more reliable carriers.

Anther root cause has literally been cash flow. Since DD+7 only hit us a short time ago, cash flow between buying/replacing stock, wages and finding the cash to even post at times has been so dire that it’s exacerbated and resulted in the late dispatching and delivery of some items, ultimately also causing my percentage on this metric to drop. On a plus, I have now secured a substantial business loan (which I wasn’t able to before) which hopefully resolves this particular root cause.

Another root cause is from inaccurate handling delays - since I’ve not hitherto been using any of the automated shipping settings (AHT and SSA) I’m happy to turn on both of these going forward though would prefer at this stage not to use Buy Shipping (unless ultimately that’s the only route available in order to resolve my appeal). I understand using a combination of all 3 can offer future OTDR protection but as I say, unless forced to use Amazon’s shipping I’d prefer not to.

I’ve also recently opened up a Royal Mail (OBA) account which will collect from me daily in future so that is another plus going forward.

These are some of my initial thoughts, I haven’t begun my appeal as yet I just wanted some feedback from others/mods before I prepare it.

Whilst I’m aware that an appeal will likely automatically be granted if I turn on SSA, AHT and Amazon Buy shipping I’d be interested in any feedback regarding preparing a potentially successful appeal that excludes the Buy Shipping part. Thanks in advance.

0 votes
0 votes
29 views
10 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_nH1JV7emu7i90
∙
user profile

Dear Community Managers,

I am requesting urgent executive assistance to resolve a complex FBA inventory receiving error across two shipments. Standard front-line Seller Support has auto-closed my cases with macro rejections, but I have absolute invoice records, carrier receipts, and inventory ledger logs proving that my physical inventory was accepted into the fulfillment network and subsequently wiped from the system ledger.

The Root Cause (Cross-Shipment Inversion):

Due to a physical labeling inversion at dispatch, two boxes were sent to alternating fulfillment centers:

1. The physical box containing the Bostik Glue was routed to LBA4 under the EUGY shipment ID.

2. The physical box containing the EUGY Kits was routed to BHX3 under the Bostik shipment ID.

Both boxes were successfully delivered by the carriers, meaning 100% of the inventory is physically safe inside the Amazon network.

Shipment 1 Details (EUGY Shipping Plan):

• Shipment ID: FBA15M8VCCPZ (Fulfillment Center: LBA4)

• Carrier Proof: UPS Proof of Delivery showing a certified weight of 3.00 kg at pickup.

• Case ID: 13323522182 (Auto-Closed)

Shipment 2 Details (Bostik Glue Shipping Plan):

• Shipment ID: FBA15M8V03S6 (Fulfillment Center: BHX3)

• Carrier Proof: DPD Parcel Number 1597 6951 723 233 Z, confirmed delivered by MANIFEST on 23 Sep 2026.

• Case ID: 13349580232 (Auto-Denied)

The Ledger Discrepancy Proof (Why the Inventory is Valid):

My Inventory Ledger screenshots clearly capture Amazon’s warehouse actively receiving this stock before digitally deleting it:

• On Sept 14, the LBA4 fulfillment center ledger logs +30 units of Bostik Glue received under the EUGY plan, confirming the physical arrival of the box.

• On Oct 5, the automated system performed a ledger correction, removing the -30 Bostik units as an "unexpected item" error.

By correcting the digital ledger instead of routing a cross-shipment transfer, the warehouse completely wiped my actual physical inventory out of the tracking queue. Both the 25 missing EUGY units at BHX3 and the 30 physical Bostik units at LBA4 are currently sitting unreconciled in the warehouses.

Documentation Attached:

I have provided the supplier invoice (Albert Harrison & Co Ltd, #769347) matching the exact stock counts, the carrier receipts, and the ledger logs showing the physical intake on Sept 14.

I need an FBA Inventory Specialist or Supervisor to look past the automated system closures, review the cross-docked locations, and process either an internal stock transfer or a physical inventory reimbursement.

Thank you for your help.

0 votes
0 votes
8 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_TufyJDtetbrlU
∙
user profile
Amazon replied

Since Amazon forced Shipping Settings Automation (SSA) onto my shipping template, my delivery promises have become an absolute mess.

Before this change, my delivery estimates worked perfectly well and reflected how I actually fulfil my orders. Since SSA took over, I'm now seeing multiple different problems and I honestly don't know how sellers are supposed to manage their delivery performance when we no longer seem to have proper control over the promises Amazon is making to customers.

A few examples from my account today:

1. STANDARD DELIVERY ESTIMATES ARE ALL OVER THE PLACE

I have now changed my individual SKU handling times to 2 days, because that accurately reflects my production/dispatch time.

Most of the listings I've checked are now showing FREE delivery Saturday 26 September, which is fine.

However, I've also got orders/listings showing Sunday 27 September.

My delivery settings clearly show my normal operating/delivery days, and I don't understand why Amazon is generating Sunday delivery promises when that isn't a delivery day I can rely on.

2. ONE-DAY AND TWO-DAY PREMIUM SHIPPING APPEAR TO BE ENABLED/LOCKED BY AUTOMATION

When I go into my shipping template, both:

Two-Day Premium Shipping

One-Day Premium Shipping

are showing as "Managed by Amazon".

When I edit Shipping Settings Automation, Royal Mail is ticked for both services, but the boxes are greyed out. I cannot untick them.

I've already established that I cannot simply turn SSA off on this template/account either.

Today I suddenly received an order headed:

"[Second Day Delivery]"

requiring dispatch the same day.

I can actually accommodate Premium orders, so that in itself isn't necessarily a problem. But why am I no longer able to decide which Premium services are enabled on my own shipping template?

3. THE PREMIUM CUT-OFF TIME IN SELLER CENTRAL DOES NOT MATCH THE PROMISE BEING SHOWN TO CUSTOMERS

My General Fulfilment Settings clearly show:

One-Day Delivery / Two-Day Delivery cut-off: 12:30 PM

Yet at approximately 10:30 this morning one of my live listings was showing:

"Fastest delivery Tomorrow, 24 September. Order within 4 hrs 23 mins."

That takes the customer ordering window to approximately 3 PM.

How can Amazon be offering next-day delivery until approximately 3 PM when Seller Central says my One-Day/Two-Day cut-off is 12:30 PM?

I cannot manufacture and dispatch a made-to-order product at 3 PM simply because Amazon has decided to extend the ordering window.

4. THIS IS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING OTDR

This is the part that concerns me most.

Amazon measures sellers against delivery promises, but SSA is now making delivery promises that I appear to have very little control over.

I've already had problems with my OTDR recently, and now I'm seeing:

Saturday promises

Sunday promises

Unexpected Second Day Delivery orders

Premium services I cannot deselect

Next-day ordering windows that don't match my configured cut-off time

How are sellers supposed to protect their OTDR when Amazon itself is controlling the delivery dates and apparently ignoring or overriding some of the settings we've entered?

I'm not against automation if it works. But taking control of the delivery promise away from the seller only works if Amazon's automation accurately understands the seller's fulfilment operation.

At the moment mine doesn't.

Has anyone else in the UK had these problems since SSA was forced onto their templates?

In particular, are you seeing Sunday delivery promises, Premium options greyed out/locked, or customer-facing next-day cut-offs that don't match the cut-off configured in Seller Central?

Because right now the whole thing feels like a complete mess.

2 votes
0 votes
221 views
48 replies
Latest activity
user profile
News_Amazon
∙
user profile

Starting on 31 August 2026, you can create exclusive, limited-time deal for business customers through Amazon Business Deals. This feature is available in the US, Canada, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Japan, Mexico and Australia.

With Amazon Business Deals, you can offer exclusive business-to-business (B2B) discounts for durations from one hour to 30 days. Choose between Fixed Price or Percent Off promotions.

During major shopping events like Prime Big Deal Days, Black Friday and other events, your deals may receive enhanced visibility through dedicated email and push notification campaigns at no additional cost until 31 December 2026.

Your products must have a 3.5+ star rating, be in new condition and meet pricing and seller performance requirements to be eligible. Deals must also meet minimum discount requirements of at least 10% off for regular deals and 15% for High-Velocity Event deals such as Prime Big Deal Days, Black Friday and Cyber Monday.

By participating, you can reach over 11 million registered business organisations globally, gain greater visibility during events and tap into the additional traffic that deal placements bring to new products.

You’ll find Amazon Business Deals in the Price Discounts tool in Seller Central for products with existing Business Prices.

To get started, go to Promotions and then select All Business Customers as your audience.

To learn more, go to Amazon Business Deals.

1 vote
0 votes
81 views
2 replies
Latest activity