Seller Forums

Results for "대학생200만원대출 탤ㄹH끄램 peckpark 주택담보대출생활안정자금 공장담보대출 페크박컨설팅 서귀포시대학생저금리대출방법"

(66 results)
user profile
Seller_dXLgfnAqnae7M
replied
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
user profile
Seller_KBCvmRKLx6ft0
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
replied
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "대학생200만원대출 탤ㄹH끄램 peckpark 주택담보대출생활안정자금 공장담보대출 페크박컨설팅 서귀포시대학생저금리대출방법"

(66 results)
user profile
Seller_dXLgfnAqnae7M
replied
user profile
OTD dropped due to late Royal Mail delivery
by Seller_dXLgfnAqnae7M

Hi we are having the same problem. We are sending all our item via Dpd and Royal Mail tracked 24. And ODR first drop to 70.5% and yesterday ODR drop to 24.5 % and don’t know why . When we check the defect report same issue the Royal Mail tracking update . It was around 200 parcel out of 1600 parcels were not delivered in time.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
9 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile

Hi @Seller_seuhA2HFFSUGv

Following up on this, the escalation team has created a case to look into the reimbursement issue (12199504272)

However, despite the shipment being marked as closed for the missing 200 units, there has been no update on this despite me providing proof of ownership documentation. The cases remain unanswered. And I have confirmation that the case above (for reimbursement) is not in fact related to these missing units. What can be done?

Here are the relevant cases for the missing 200 units:

12203300112

12160538462

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
13 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
user profile
Amazon replied

Hello, my shipments are small parcels, which usually get delivered and checked-in within 1 week maximum. However, I have 2 shipments sent recently that have been held up and I don't understand why?

Shipment ID FBA15LBZRVN9

200 units, 2 boxes (LCY3 & LBA4)

Marked as Delivered 23 January 2026 & 28 Jan.

Not checked in yet? Usually this happens on the same day and Status moves to "Receiving"

Shipment ID FBA15LFDSQKN

90 units, 2 boxes (LCY2 & EMA1)

Latest update: Feb 13, 2026 08:01:00 AM - Amazon GB - The delivery of your parcel has been rescheduled based on your shipment instructions for the carrier.

I have not specified anything as such?

Please can you help me? Furthermore, I seem to have 2 other Closed shipments where 0 units were found, even though the boxes contained units with the correct barcode, I haven't done anything differently. I'm not sure what is going on!

(Shipping ID for these with missing units are FBA15L8ZFFPR and FBA15L91DN6B)

This is majorly impacting my business, as most of my sales are through Amazon and now customers have 0 units to purchase.. Please can you help? Here are some cases I have already filed, but no success through this route..

Case IDs

12094169842

12141482952

12141774002

12141739702

1 vote
0 votes
109 views
13 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile

hi @Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob

Following up on this, as you mentioned the escalation team has created a case to look into the reimbursement issue (12199504272)

However, despite the shipment being marked as closed for the missing 200 units, there has been no update on this despite me providing proof of ownership documentation. The cases remain unanswered. And I have confirmation that the case above (for reimbursement) is not in fact related to these missing units. What can be done?

Here are the relevant cases for the missing 200 units: 12203300112

12160538462

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
13 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile

hi @Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob

Thank you. I can see the new case refers to the issue of reimbursement (Point 3 in my comment just before your reply).

There has been no update at all on my 200 missing packs as seen in case ID 12141482952 (Points 1 & 2). What can we do about this? I’ve had no response from seller central despite asking and providing proof of ownership..

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
13 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile

@Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4 Just confirming that the case you reference above (12199504272) does NOT address the issue of the missing 200 units - it is the seperate reimbursement issue. This has been confirmed by the case worker.

Here are the relevant cases, regarding the missing units I would appreciate if this is looked into as it has been weeks now! I have also provided an amended correct proof of ownership already, but have had no response?:

12203300112

12160538462

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
13 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_ZJhiFfua0EPgc
replied
user profile

Hi @Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4, thanks for this. However the case you are referring to is titled 'Selling Partner Communities Support - Re-evaluation Reimbursement' which is causing confusion. I know there is a reimbursement re-evaluation that is ongoing, but I am wondering if the issue of the 200 missing packs is also being addressed there? Please can you clarify.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
13 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
user profile

So, we now have over 200 items that will be removed from the inventory in the next 4 weeks, Amazon is asking for compliance documents, however the official documents produced by the manufacturer to prove that their product complies with all safety requirements are not acceptable.

The only way to get a product approved is to send it to one of Amazon's newly appointed third party compliance testing companies who will charge up to £1500 to do a test and supply a report on the product.

I want to know WHY Amazon is not accepting the Globally accepted compliance documents supplied by the manufacturer of the product?

Here is an example of a make-up set, the manufacturer has an 10 page compliance document (I have just shown the first page) but this item will be removed unless it is sent to Amazon's third party testers to produce a report, I am not paying for something that I already have, it is unbelievable that they are doing this and I can only assume that it is a money spinner or another way to whittle down third party sellers.

As sellers we have to make sure that everything is in place before listing items, intellectual property checks, compliance documents, provenance of products and reliance of suppliers, so we order the products knowing they are compliant and can prove it, we list them and low and behold Amazon is asking for proof of compliance, no problem, I have the 10 page document that I sought before listing the product, no sorry, you have to use one of our testing houses and pay for a compliance document costing up to £1500 or your product will be removed and you will receive a policy violation into the bargain.

It is frankly unbelievable and whoever approved this policy needs to answer for it. I suspect that it is to do with redundancies in the Amazon compliance department and there are now insufficient people to check documents in house, I don't know only my opinion, I believe however that the policy legally is dubious, but what can anyone do?

2 votes
0 votes
29 views
2 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_KBCvmRKLx6ft0
user profile
Rate of feedback left
by Seller_KBCvmRKLx6ft0
Amazon replied

We only have about 1 in 200 orders leave feedback for us, is this the sort of rate everyone else sees on here? I'm sure we used to get at least twice as many.

Obviously the few unhappy customers (usually because of delivery delays) are more likely to leave feedback so every negative has a big impact.

In contrast, we have about 7 in every 100 orders on Shopify leave us a review on Trustpilot.

1 vote
0 votes
45 views
8 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
replied
user profile

This is a new policy that has just come about, any product that may be used as a child's item has now been moved to toys where compliance is required and of course now the only option for compliance is to use Amazon's new paid third party companies, you have to pay to have this done.

So by moving everything that MIGHT be used by a child into the toys category has created a great revenue stream for Amazon as you won't get it approved unless you send it away and have it tested.

I have about 200 items that were in other categories now moved to toys and every one so far has been refused when requested to re-classify, way to go Amazon!

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
19 replies
Latest activity