Hi everyone,
I’m looking for experience and advice from fellow Amazon sellers stuck in the Verification required for tax purposes pending review. This is a widespread account compliance review affecting the majority of sellers currently.
I submitted all complete and valid business documents on August 25, 2026. My review status has been pending for over 15 days, with 40 days left until the compliance deadline.
I have contacted seller support multiple times for updates and escalation. The consistent reply is that Amazon is facing severe internal review backlogs, and no manual priority or acceleration is available for individual seller cases.
The current fixed deadline policy is very rigid. All review delays stem from Amazon’s internal processing backlog, yet sellers face strict account compliance deadlines with no official grace period.
This issue brings significant operational risks. I have large volumes of FBA inventory in transit. Failure to complete the review on time may lead to sales restrictions, fund withholding and blocked inventory reception, causing unnecessary financial losses for compliant sellers.
Nearly all sellers I know are facing the same long-pending review situation. I would really appreciate it if you could share your review progress, timeline and any effective solutions in the comments.
Thank you all for sharing and helping!
Hello Amazon Seller Forums,
I am looking for guidance and assistance regarding an unresolved FBA inbound shipment discrepancy. I would appreciate it if a Community Manager could review the case and advise whether it can be escalated to the appropriate internal team for a manual investigation.
Shipment Information
Shipment ID: FBA15M0316WZ
Reference ID: 16EJHKKV
Fulfillment Center: LBA4
Carrier-reported delivery date: August 27, 2026
Seller Support Case ID: 13259926462
Total cartons shipped: 10
Total units shipped: 540
Units currently recorded as received: 216
Units currently unaccounted for: 324
This is not simply a unit-level receiving discrepancy.
Based on the documented packing configuration, the discrepancy corresponds exactly to six complete cartons.
The shipment contained 10 cartons, with the same packing configuration for each carton:
54 units per carton
Dimensions: 45 × 30 × 54 cm
Weight: approximately 12.5 kg per carton
Total shipment weight: approximately 125 kg
Receiving Discrepancy
According to our packing list, the shipment contained:
SKU A
Expected: 500 units
Received: 200 units
Discrepancy: 300 units
SKU B
Expected: 40 units
Received: 16 units
Discrepancy: 24 units
Therefore, Amazon's receiving records currently account for only 216 of the 540 units shipped, leaving 324 units unaccounted for.
Based on the carton configuration, 324 units correspond exactly to 6 full cartons (6 × 54 units).
For privacy reasons, I have not included the complete SKU/FNSKU details in this public post. We have the packing list, shipment information, carrier delivery confirmation/POD, and other supporting documentation available and can provide them if needed.Looking for Guidance Regarding an Unresolved FBA Inbound Shipment Discrepancy – Shipment FBA15M0316WZ
Previous Seller Support Case
We have already contacted Amazon Selling Partner Support regarding this issue under Case ID 13259926462.
However, the latest response appears to be a standard/template response and does not seem to address the specific circumstances of this shipment, particularly the fact that:
The carrier reports the shipment as delivered to Amazon's fulfillment center on August 27, 2026;
The shipment consisted of 10 cartons with a consistent packing configuration;
Amazon's receiving records currently account for only 216 of the 540 units;
The remaining 324 units represent 6 complete cartons based on the documented packing configuration.
The response did not provide a detailed reconciliation of the shipment at the carton or receiving level, nor did it explain what happened to the unaccounted-for units after delivery.
Assistance Requested
I completely understand that inbound shipments can sometimes experience receiving delays or discrepancies, and I am not looking to dispute the standard process.
At this point, I would simply appreciate assistance in determining whether the shipment can receive a manual investigation beyond the standard Seller Support workflow.
If possible, could a Community Manager please review Case 13259926462 and help escalate it to the appropriate FBA Inbound / Receiving / Inventory Reconciliation team?
In particular, we would appreciate a review of:
The receiving records for Shipment FBA15M0316WZ at LBA4;
Carton-level receiving and scanning records;
The shipment's carton count and receiving history;
Any internal inventory movements or transfers associated with the shipment;
Whether the 324 currently unaccounted-for units can be located and reconciled.
If the missing inventory cannot be located after the investigation, we would also appreciate guidance regarding the applicable reimbursement process.
We have the packing list, shipment information, carrier delivery confirmation/POD, and other supporting documentation available and can provide them if needed.
Thank you very much for taking the time to review this. We would greatly appreciate any guidance or assistance from a Community Manager in getting this shipment manually reviewed.
Dear Amazon Moderators,
We are requesting moderator assistance with an unresolved FBA inbound shipment issue.
Shipment ID: FBA15LWHXQY7
Case ID: 13214485052
Fulfillment Centre: LBA4
Carrier: Amazon Freight – Shipment 2240145301
We have repeatedly contacted Seller Support and have now submitted a complete evidence package, but the latest response on September 15, 2026 repeated the same standard reimbursement denial without addressing the new evidence.
Key facts:
- Amazon Freight records the shipment as 73 boxes / 3 UK pallets / 1,075.53 kg.
- The CMR states that the shipper counted and loaded the freight and that the driver confirmed there were no changes to the shipment details.
- Amazon Freight confirmed delivery to LBA4 on August 10, 2026.
- We also obtained written confirmation that the goods were unloaded on August 10.
- Amazon’s earlier investigation reported 169 units missing.
- Amazon’s latest investigation now reports only 125 units missing.
Therefore, 44 units previously classified as missing are no longer classified as missing, but Seller Support has not explained what happened to these 44 units or why Amazon’s receiving records changed after the previous investigation.
The remaining 125 units correspond to 40 full cartons, not random individual-unit shortages.
We have specifically asked Seller Support to investigate the receiving records and the 44-unit discrepancy, but the responses continue to repeat only that POD does not prove the exact quantity received.
We are not asking Amazon to rely solely on the POD.
We are requesting review of the complete evidence and Amazon’s own changing receiving records.
Could an Amazon moderator please help escalate Case 13214485052 to the appropriate FBA Inbound / LBA4 Receiving investigation team for a substantive review?
Thank you.
Is anyone else having this issue still?
This happened last year I wasn't able to make removal orders for my FBA stock, I just get an error message, I've followed every step provided by seller support my return address is filled in and it's correct, all of my charge methods are up to date.
I had read online before that sellers from Northern Ireland have been having this issue, the system just won't allow removal orders to be made to Northern Ireland
When I contacted seller support last year they never got to the bottom of it they just said they didn't know what the issue was.
I was lucky I just sold the items off eventually, but I have a very small amount of stock remaining and for the past few months they have been charging me £40 a month in long term storage fees, but I literally can't remove the stock to stop these fees being charged
Seller support keep saying the fees are applicable because I'm opted in but I've explained I can't opt out because it won't let me make removal orders
How is this still happening a year later?
How can a company as big as Amazon not fix something like this or atleast stop charging fees for stranded inventory that can't be returned as their system won't allow it?
Easy ship is Evri only yes, you get a lot of defects for late shipment as items aren’t often scanned on time. They do remove these though but your account will go in and out of being “at risk”.
Date padding for 2/3 late deliveries is added to the premium shipping dates so it will show around 8 days for items to reach you.
Any late deliveries go on your premium shipping defect report which they shouldn’t do. But they do. So that’s sitting at 40% just now.
It’s cheap but you get what you pay for, j have to do a minnimhm of 160 parcels A DAY. Which is fine if they don’t add an 8 day extension for weeks on end.
Had to revert back to Royal Mail buy shipping
I registered for VAT payments in October 1986 just before I opened my first shop.
I have paid VAT every 3 months since then. This is nearly 40 years worth of payments, except for the 1 or 2 occasions when I received a refund rather than made a payment.
That is approximately 158 times I have paid HMRC for the collection of VAT from my customers.
Surprise, surprise Amazon have decided I am not complicit with VAT registration and I am threatened with account closure in October. Meanwhile they deduct the VAT from my sale price and keep it.
I have jumped through all the required hoops but they still will not accept that I am VAT registered.
Why does it all have to be so impossible?
@Seller_HFHgeklg7QWlB Hello again :)
You're absolutely right to be frustrated, and you're not alone — this is a widespread issue affecting many long-established UK sellers.
Why this is happening: Amazon is legally required under UK Joint and Several Liability (JSL) legislation to verify that sellers have valid VAT registration. The system does this by cross-referencing your VAT number against HMRC's database, checking that the legal name and registered address on your Seller Central account match exactly what HMRC holds on file. Even a minor discrepancy — a slightly different spelling, an abbreviated name, or an old address — will cause the verification to fail.
The most common reason for rejection: For UK sole traders, HMRC registers the VAT number under your personal name (as it appears on official government records), not your trading name. If your Amazon Seller Central account uses your trading/business name rather than the exact legal name HMRC has on file, the system will reject it every time — regardless of how long you've been VAT registered.
Regarding Amazon deducting VAT from your sales: When Amazon cannot verify your VAT registration, their system can treat you as if you are a non-UK established seller. Under UK law, Amazon is then required to collect and remit the VAT directly to HMRC on your behalf. This means the VAT is still being paid to HMRC — it's not being "kept" by Amazon — but it does create a mess for your own VAT returns because you may end up double-paying.
Steps to resolve this:
If everything matches but it's still rejected: Email vat-number-appeals@amazon.com with:
Escalate if needed: If the appeals email doesn't resolve it, email managingdirector@amazon.co.uk — this tends to get escalated to teams who can actually investigate properly.
Important: You can also provide your last 3 VAT filings submitted to HMRC (downloaded from HMRC Online, including the submission receipt reference) as additional proof of your compliance. Nearly 40 years of filings is about as strong a case as anyone could make.
I know it feels like you're being treated as guilty until proven innocent, but the root cause is almost always a data mismatch rather than Amazon genuinely doubting your VAT status. Once the name/address alignment is sorted, verification typically completes within 7 working days.
Hope this helps!
JiAlex
I am being wrongfully charged VAT (tax) twice on all my orders. I have confirmed my non established status in UK and was informed by amazon that, they will keep collecting and remitting to the responsible Tax Authorities any VAT on your sales of goods delivered to customers in the UK. Which they were doing since May but now on 13th august warning sign of At risk start appearing on my account health and amazon again asked for Establishment verification required for VAT purposes. I again submitted as i do not meet the establishment criteria and received an email and notification in performance notification stating same as before only this time they are asking me to update my primary operating address to reflect non-establishment which i will update as i have 60 days to submit that i am arranging verification documents for my address to confirm it as primary operating address that is another issue.
But after that email of confirmation from amazon they have started charging me VAT on all the service Fees they charge me along with 20% VAT amount they have withheld on total order amount. As a result i end up paying around 40% VAT in total on a item sold.
Already lost too much in 2 weeks due to this. Can anyone please help me get this resolve tried contacting seller support but no logical reason from them all they explain me is basic math and keep on insisting me that its ok to get charged VAT twice for a single transaction.
@Seller_9Kb3jdNMszN2C@Seller_CnfW62x6yxvJw@Seller_j9Bd91CW3ZVpr@Seller_zukQNO61PzGck@Seller_YeWcEeTwlVO93
@Seller_o6qE06K9lSfyx
I understand how frustrating this is — effectively losing ~40% to VAT on each sale is clearly unsustainable. Let me explain what's happening and what you can do about it.
There are two separate VAT mechanisms at play here, and the issue is that Amazon's systems may be applying both simultaneously when they shouldn't be:
1. VAT Withheld on Sales (20% on the order total)
Under UK VAT on e-Commerce (VOEC) legislation effective since January 2021, Amazon is legally required to collect and remit UK VAT on sales made by non-UK-established sellers where goods are delivered from UK inventory to UK customers. This is the "deemed reseller" rule — Amazon acts as the deemed supplier for VAT purposes, collects 20% VAT from the customer at checkout, and remits it directly to HMRC. You should NOT be receiving this VAT amount in your disbursements, and you should NOT need to report or remit it yourself.
This part is correct and expected for a confirmed non-established seller.
2. VAT Charged on Service Fees (20% on referral fees, FBA fees, etc.)
This is where the problem likely lies. Since August 2024, Amazon EU Sarl (AEU) invoices seller fees through local branches. If your business is established in a country where AEU has a branch (UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland, Belgium, Sweden), local VAT is added to your fees.
However — and this is the critical point — if you are confirmed as non-established in the UK, you should NOT be treated as UK-established for fee invoicing purposes. Sellers on the deemed reseller enforcement list (i.e., confirmed non-established sellers) should have their fee calculations zero-rated, meaning no UK VAT should be applied to your service fees.
Why this is likely happening?
It appears that Amazon's system has confirmed your non-established status for the sales VAT collection side (correctly withholding 20% on orders), but the fee invoicing side may still be treating you as UK-established and charging you 20% VAT on fees.
This is a known inconsistency that can occur when:
In other words, the "sales engine" correctly treats you as non-established (withholds VAT on sales), while the "fee engine" incorrectly treats you as UK-established (charges VAT on fees). You're right that this results in double taxation.
Immediate Steps:
1. Download your fee invoices from Seller Central (Reports > Tax Document Library). Check the citation/legal text on the invoices. If they reference UK VAT law and show 20% VAT on your fees, this confirms the fee system is treating you as UK-established.
2. Open a new case with Seller Support, but specifically request escalation to the Tax Team or EU Compliance Team (not general support). In your case, clearly state:
Reference your Performance Notification that confirmed your non-established status. Attach a screenshot if possible.
3. Update your primary operating address as soon as you can. The fee VAT calculation uses your "Primary Place of Business" (PPOB) to determine where you're established. If your PPOB currently shows a UK address, the fee system will charge UK VAT regardless of your deemed reseller status.
For recovering the overcharged VAT:
Important Note on the 60-Day Address Update
You mentioned you have 60 days to update your primary operating address. Do not delay this. The address update may be what triggers the fee system to stop charging you UK VAT. Until your PPOB reflects a non-UK address, the fee calculation system may continue to apply 20% UK VAT to your fees.
If you don't complete the address verification within 60 days, Amazon may withhold future disbursements, and if still not completed within a further 30 days, your account could be suspended.
For other sellers in this situation
If you're a non-established seller who has been confirmed as non-established but is still being charged VAT on service fees:
This would be really helpful for anyone else caught in this gap between the two systems.
Hope this helps! 🤝
JiAlex
Hope you are doing good.
I am very well, thank you, and hope you are too and not getting unnecessarily stressed over this issue (there are enough other things on Amazon to stress about)
I am going to amend my illustration. Your net price is £2.50 and you are essentially paying VAT on sales of only 20% or £0.50, no more, not 40+%. This is being dealt with by Amazon, and is a separate issue, which you acknowledged is as it should be.
The other £0.41 is VAT on expenses, or COGS, not VAT on sales, totally separate and no different to any other seller. There is a big difference. VAT on sales is not reclaimable. VAT on expenses should be shown on your monthly invoices and is reclaimable, so you are not, in the end, paying over 40% in VAT, only 20% on net sales.
Sorry, @Seller_j9Bd91CW3ZVpr, but (only) this bit is not correct, as I indicated above, only 20% is lost eventually (actually was only held for HMRC, never belonged to the seller or Amazon). The actual margin is not affected, only cashflow.
@Seller_o6qE06K9lSfyx The only thing you are really querying is whether or not Amazon should be charging VAT on fees. Introducing VAT on sales and suggesting VAT on fees affects your margin has confused the issue, and diverted it away from the main query. I guess I am partly to blame for going off on a tangent, sorry.
I wouldn't rely on TAX advice from other sellers, even this forum. Almost all are not qualified to give advice, only opinions and these should be checked with a qualified expert.
Don't forget, if Amazon repay the VAT already charged, and hopefully supply a credit note for the original and re-invoice showing reverse charge VAT (zero VAT), any VAT on the original invoices claimed previously by you needs repaying to HMRC.
I was wondering if you have a UK office registered on Companies House and Amazon. If so, this could be why Amazon are not reverse charging the VAT. I would think (again, opinion, not advice) all addresses on your seller account should be in your home country. This has cropped up many times, and it would be good to get some firm information from a mod. Also seller university to be updated to be absolutely clear about this and virtual offices.