BigWhiteRabbit, I've used two approaches which have both had a pretty good success rate. These have been found through discussions with others on the forum who have shared their experiences. Big thanks to Mayflower, Northern Trading, Hemisphere, and probably a few others I've forgotten.
For Funkos and other collectibles items, I've argued that these are not toys but collectibles. Here is wording I've used (customise for the listing as needed):
"This product does not require these documents because it is not a children's toy. It is a collectible for display by adult collectors. This is evidenced by its categorisation ("Hobbies > Collectible Figures & Memorabilia"). It says in its title it is a "Collectable Vinyl Figurine for Shelf Display". The first bullet point on the product detail page says "this vinyl mini figurine complements other collectable merchandise and fits perfectly in your display case or on your desk.". There is no expectation or mention of play or use by children."
For toys, I have used variations on:
"The product packaging features [UKCA and CE] marks, printed on [location where it is printed on the packaging]. These can clearly be seen in image [X] on the product detail page.
Under European and British toy safety law, printing these marks is a legal declaration by the manufacturer that the item has been extensively individually tested and complies with all relevant safety requirements, including the EU's Toy Safety Directive (2009/48/EC) and BS EN 71 parts 1, 2, and 3. The manufacturer [Manufacturer, e.g. Hasbro, Mattel] is a large and highly reputable organisation that rigorously tests all of its products for sale into the EU and UK."
I'm down to about 100 listings now, from a peak of around 300.
Hi.. Really help someone can advise on this as I am getting nowhere with seller support.
All our listings are SFP but are not displaying the prime badge and are currently showing 3 day delivery.
Was originally told by seller support to disable SSA which we did, this did make our listings show next day delivery but still no prime badge, was then advised to enable SSA which has them all now showing 3 day delivery again
Orders are still showing to be dispatched same day as they are still prime orders but just not showing the prime badge or next day delivery
all shipping settings are correct and Prime enabled
Seller support originally said maybe our carrier (Royal Mail) was not meeting delivery expectations, however I then informed them that we have..
100% on time delivery
100% on time dispatch
100% of delivery purchased through Amazon buy shipping with a linked Royal mail business account so they agreed this was not the case.
Also 0% order cancellation and account is healthy
SSA activated with Royal mail tracked 24 as preferred service
none of my inventory display "FREE Shipping for Prime members" or "Prime FREE Delivery" messaging rather than the Prime badge itself.. they all show 3 day delivery
And to make things worse all the links Amazon are sending me to reply are opening in french, some serious glitches here, is this issue happening to any other sellers.?
Thanks for any help.
Any other FBM’ noticing their premium delivery options have stopped working on their listings since yesterday?
Our otdr is 98% and vtr is 100% and PD eligibility is allowed. We hit our PD metrics with 100% each week so this isn’t performance related.
Our standard delivery is working and showing correct so know we’re not being padded either. It’s just the ‘or fastest delivery by…’ is missing off all listings. We don’t use SSA so know it’s not courier predictions either.
Scrolling through the search page in fact I can’t see any ‘or fastest delivery by…’ on anyone’s products so have Amazon removed premium delivery off all FBM sellers running up in the final week to Father’s Day?
Hello Amazon Community & Forum Support,
I am writing to highlight a major loop in the Brand Approval (ungating) process that leaves sellers trapped when automated systems malfunction and Support offers conflicting advice.
We have submitted brand approval applications repeatedly for several established brands (Armaf, L’Oréal Paris, and Sally Hansen). Every single document required as per submission is provided:
• Tax invoices dated within 180 days from verified, authorized UK trade distributors.
• Quantities exceeding the minimum unit or combined requirement on individual line items.
• Business names and billing addresses matching our Seller Central Legal Entity 100%.
• Supplementary documentation including bank statements proving full payment and official distributor registration details.
Despite meeting every single requirement, the applications face instant automated rejections within minutes - clearly triggered by OCR system errors rather than human evaluation. No explanation provided nor further information requested.
When opening support cases to request human review, we receive contradictory responses, vague and I helpful. Some agents state Seller Support "does not have a saying in brand issues," while others state the cases are under review with decision dates days out:
• Armaf Application (ASIN: B0BBM9LLD1) – Case ID: 1313360622
• L'ORÉAL PARIS Application (ASIN: B07MR58Q4Q) – Case ID: 13129738532
• Sally Hansen Application (ASIN: B00BJMLHDC) – Case ID: 13130710802
The complete lack of specific feedback or human oversight creates an unworkable standard where sellers fulfill every policy requirement on paper, yet are left with no clear path to resolution or explanation.
Could a Forum Community Manager please look into these cases and escalate them to the ungating team for proper human review?
Thanks!!
@Seller_l7Jtck9jxnEA0@Seller_9Kb3jdNMszN2C@Seller_PIHyltK09pbl3@Seller_xkwDczt8sPSmx
An update to demonstrate how broken this process is:
I just submitted fresh applications for L'Oréal and Sally Hansen. Beyond the required tax invoices, I attached:
• Official tax invoices (over 100 units)
• Bank payment proofs
• Official delivery notes
• Physical photos of the stock in hand
BOTH applications were rejected again within 20 minutes.
It is physically impossible for a human agent to review four comprehensive sets of compliance documents in 20 minutes.
These are automated OCR bots auto-rejecting legitimate, fully verified UK supply chain documentation without a single human ever reviewing them.
Amazon says upon submission, that we may verify these - well clearly you haven't - the supplier details are on the invoices!
We are making real capital investments based on Amazon’s policy requirements, only to be blocked by faulty software filters.
Can a Forum Moderator PLEASE manually escalate these specific cases to a human manager on the Selling Applications team?
Seriously thinking of a formal written complaint, including all interaction with Amazon to date and auto-responses!
@Seller_hzIJKXzwjDVso@Seller_8hQgfj6OVZYse




Hi everyone,
I'm trying to work out whether what I'm seeing is specific to my account or whether it's being experienced more widely.
I'm an established UK FBM seller in the personalised gifts category.
Over the last week or so, sales have been noticeably quieter than I'd normally expect for this time of year, and my Business Reports suggest sessions are also down.
I've checked everything I can think of:
Account Health is perfect.
Voice of the Customer is fine (one historic issue but nothing new).
Pricing Health shows no problems.
All 246 active listings are Featured Offer eligible.
Spot-checking listings shows I'm still winning the Featured Offer.
Conversion rate appears to be fairly normal – it seems to be traffic that's lower.
I have recently updated a large number of titles to comply with Amazon's new title character limits, but I'm unsure whether that's relevant or simply a coincidence.
I've also noticed the Seller App showing a lower Featured Offer percentage than usual (usually we're at 99-100% but it's dropped to 76% in 4 days), but when I drill into Seller Central everything appears healthy, so I'm not convinced that's related. To note, we're brand registered.
Are any other UK FBM sellers (particularly in gifts or personalised products) seeing a similar drop in sessions or sales over the past week or two than previous years?
If so, has anyone found a cause, or does it just seem to be a particularly quiet late July?
Thanks!
The wait is over! Our Seller Forums Product Spotlight is here! 🎉 We're inviting sellers of all experience levels to take part in our Forums sweepstakes by trying Seller Assistant and sharing their experience. Your feedback could not only help us improve the tool but also help a fellow seller discover something new.
Here are a few things you can ask Seller Assistant:
How to participate:
Want to show us how it went? Drop a screenshot of your conversation using the image icon (📷) in the reply box. Supported formats: JPG or PNG, up to 4MB.
10 winners will be randomly selected to receive a £100 Amazon gift card.
We're accepting responses on this thread only from now until 08/17. We will notify the potential prize winners via their Seller Central account and post the winner's usernames on Forums. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. Limit one entry per person. See Official Rules for details.
It's one of the most frustrating situations in selling: a buyer opens an A-to-Z Guarantee claim, receives a full refund, and keeps your product. You're left out of pocket with no item returned. Sound familiar?
You're not alone — and there are steps you can take. Let's break down what's actually happening, what your rights are, and how to protect your account going forward.
🔍 Why does this happen?
The A-to-Z Guarantee exists to protect buyers when a transaction doesn't go as expected. When Amazon investigates a claim, the decision depends on evidence like:
If Amazon cannot confirm delivery to the buyer's satisfaction — even with basic tracking — the claim may be granted without requiring the buyer to return the item.
⚠️ The impact on your account
An A-to-Z claim that isn't denied counts towards your Order Defect Rate (ODR). Amazon requires sellers to maintain an ODR below 1% over a rolling 60-day period. Too many defects can trigger:
• Account health warnings
• Listing restrictions
• In severe cases, account deactivation
You can monitor this via your Account Health Dashboard in Seller Central.
✅ What you can do RIGHT NOW
1. Respond promptly — always: You have 48 hours to respond to Amazon's request for additional information. If you miss this window, the claim is automatically granted in the buyer's favour, your account is debited, and your ODR takes a hit.
2. Provide compelling evidence: If you used Buy Shipping and shipped on time, Amazon will cover delivery-related A-to-Z claims and they won't count against your ODR, no additional proof of delivery is required for this protection. If you did NOT use Buy Shipping, a carrier delivery scan alone may not be enough to win a claim. Strengthen your case with:
• Signature confirmation
• Photographic proof of delivery
• Proof of item weight matching the dispatched parcel
• Any buyer-seller messages acknowledging receipt
3. Appeal the decision: If a claim is granted and you believe it was unfair, you can appeal. Present new, relevant evidence not previously considered. Be factual, concise, and professional.
4. Request a return before refunding: If you choose to refund proactively, remember: you may request the buyer return the item before you process that refund. This is within your rights as a seller.
5. Report suspected buyer abuse: Amazon's systems evaluate buyer behaviour patterns. If you believe a buyer is abusing the A-to-Z process, report it through Seller Central by going to Performance > Account Health > Report Abuse and selecting the appropriate reason. Amazon does investigate repeat abusers.
🛡️ Prevent future claims — best practices
• Always use tracked delivery with signature confirmation for high-value items
• Communicate proactively with buyers about dispatch and delivery timelines
• Keep your messaging within Amazon's platform — off-platform comms aren't considered in disputes
• Set realistic delivery expectations in your listings
• Monitor your Account Health Dashboard weekly
📚 Helpful resources
• A-to-Z Guarantee Claims help page
• Order Defect Rate & Account Health
• Appeal an A-to-Z Claim decision
__________________________
🔥 Unpopular opinion time
Here's a debate that divides sellers every time it comes up:
"Signature confirmation on every order is overkill — the cost eats into margins and most buyers are legitimate."
Others say:
"After losing £200+ to a claim I couldn't win, I'll never send anything without it again. Non-negotiable."
Where do you stand? And at what order value does signature confirmation become essential for you — £20? £50? £100+?
Drop your number and your reasoning below! 👇
Hello Amazon Community Managers,
I am requesting an urgent escalation to the appropriate Amazon Payments or Disbursements team.
Amazon has withheld all disbursements from our Amazon.co.uk seller account since November 2025. The balance was £38,551.35 when our formal complaint was submitted, and proceeds from all new sales are also continuing to be placed into reserve.
Account details:
Marketplace: Amazon.co.uk
Seller ID: 710189747402
Merchant token: A1MSK4F60XBPDG
Relevant case IDs: 13044225192, 13060609162, 13111691602
Funds withheld since: November 2025
Account status: Active
Deposit bank account: Verified
Outstanding compliance requests: None visible
The account previously underwent an extended KYC review and was reinstated.
After reinstatement, Amazon Lending was incorrectly associated with our seller account even though our company had not taken the alleged loan. Amazon later investigated and corrected that error. Our deposit bank account is now successfully added and verified.
Despite this:
* The account is active and continues to generate sales.
* No compliance or verification action is outstanding.
* No reserve reason appears in Performance Notifications, Account Health or the Account Level Reserve section.
* No release date or transaction-level explanation has been provided.
* Seller Support repeatedly says the matter has been transferred to an internal or disbursement team, but no substantive response follows.
* All new seller proceeds continue to be withheld.
On 2 August 2026, we submitted a formal complaint through the Amazon Payments Services Complaints process. The portal did not issue a complaint reference and only stated that Amazon would respond through the registered email address.
Could a Community Manager please:
1. Escalate this case directly to the appropriate Amazon Payments UK or Disbursements team.
2. Confirm which internal team currently owns the matter.
3. Confirm whether any action or document remains outstanding from us.
4. Obtain a written explanation for the 100% reserve.
5. Provide a definite review and disbursement timeline.
6. Request immediate release of all undisputed funds.
This is creating severe and continuing cashflow pressure because Amazon is allowing the account to trade while withholding 100% of both historic and new proceeds.
We are ready to provide any information genuinely required, but we need a specific owner, explanation and resolution rather than another general instruction to wait or contact Seller Support.
Thank you.
The daily advertising expenditure limit for my store has been restricted by Amazon's artificial intelligence since the start of product sales. The limit is only about 10 pounds per day. This restriction has lasted for approximately 1 and a half months. During this period, I made 7 consecutive and timely payments for the advertising bills, and there were no issues with the credit balance of my credit card and seller account. However, when I submitted an advertising case to appeal, I always received almost identical and unquestionable responses from the human customer service: more payment records (bigger payment bills) and more time are needed for credit verification.
I don't understand. Since larger amounts and more spending are required to verify the credit of my advertising account, why is my daily advertising consumption limit blocked? This is not a coherent solution proposed by Amazon's artificial intelligence. It simply doesn't work! Moreover, according to my research on the advertising limit issues on Amazon, it only mentions a daily limit of 100 US dollars. But my store has an astonishing daily limit of 10 pounds. It seems that my store is the most unreasonable limit in the entire Amazon seller universe! And there are an astonishing 3,000 new products in my warehouse, which are consuming huge storage fees, causing a devastating blow to the sales business and severely damaging the company's cash flow. Even to the point of having to dissolve the operation team.
Is this mechanical and harsh AI review mechanism really correct and useful? Does it really maintain the fairness of the Amazon platform, ensure the security of Amazon's risk control, or distort the reality of justice? Under the condition that all our indicators are normal, the advertising limit has been unreasonably controlled for over a month, preventing products from being sold and promoted, and causing a huge backlog of cash flow. I have repeatedly opened cases to consult relevant personnel to solve such problems, but they were all evaded, and only repetitive and meaningless responses were given. The feedback from countless appeals all pointed to the same direction: the artificial intelligence wrongly determined my advertising limit and either closed or extended all possible recovery channels. As honest Amazon sellers, we no longer want to pay for the errors caused by the large-scale introduction of artificial intelligence by Amazon. We have no effective appeal channels and are also worried that there is no correct human supervision of the artificial intelligence. This problem needs to be publicly acknowledged and resolved by the official. We, the vast majority of buyers, can no longer pay for such systemic problems!

