Seller Forums

Results for "정부지원무보증서민대출 탤레 peckpark 페크박컨설팅 대학생200만원대출 홍성군비대면작업대출 군무원대출"

(51 results)
user profile
Seller_gtBZn43g19Whn
replied
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
user profile
Seller_3tUpTbUNDbwCw
replied
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
Seller_aw46PzfsCWh3F
user profile
Seller_Z6JEwkZB24rWj
replied
user profile
Seller_Fg2fqaWOnEtha
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "정부지원무보증서민대출 탤레 peckpark 페크박컨설팅 대학생200만원대출 홍성군비대면작업대출 군무원대출"

(51 results)
user profile
Seller_gtBZn43g19Whn
replied
user profile

We have had this issue for years with Amazons inaccurate delivery dates over weekends.

Parcels dispatched on T24 on Friday, all confirmed as being delivered on Saturday, week after week.

Saturday dispatch, confirmed as delivery Sunday...

Still, amazon shows 2-3 day delivery over weekends. Friday shows Monday, Saturday shows Tuesday...

4 x staff in on a Saturday to dispatch orders

99% on all delivery metrics, 200-300 parcels per day.

Seems to be the case for all FBM sellers, FBA doesn't have the same issue.

Annoyingly, Amazon seem to be doing this to force customers into choosing FBA over FBM.

Not sure if they will ever listen to us. I don't see why they do this, a lot of what we sell is unique, so it's not giving us a disadvantage compared to other sellers, just harming customers expectations.

@Seller_FJwyF3iu5qxUY

@Seller_DNQGSsdC7DccM

@Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN

@Seller_TSXM2A5nxWSuH

@Seller_WIFV02H2XUFgS

@Seller_vW3l7M6oLYiHv

@Seller_khUF6HPR2AHxu

@Seller_OYhlMo20wlr0d

@Seller_t9kvdr2yixQej

@Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV

@Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4

@Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP

@Seller_j9Bd91CW3ZVpr

@Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob

@Seller_l7Jtck9jxnEA0

@Seller_dnxnrsZIeTNo3

@Seller_JT2cdQLa0Oueg

@Seller_l3eCP9f1PtJXC

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
5 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_AJxxLujbGDqaW
user profile

Has Amazon completely lost the plot or is this just another money making operation? So now Amazon want you to send the item to an approved third party testing company to receive a certificate of compliance and of course pay for it.

So forget that the manufacturer already has all the relevant documents and the item has passed all the safety and compliance requirements, but no, they are no good, the only way to get the product approved is to use the third party company chosen by Amazon.

Yet another death by a thousand cuts for third party sellers?

Maybe I have this wrong, but 200 of my previously safety compliant items are now due for removal unless I send them to one of these companies and pay them to produce a certificate of compliance for Amazon.

Well, I know what is going to happen to those listings, they will be removed and I will sell the items elsewhere with the correct safety and compliance documents supplied by the manufacturer of the product.

Any comments?

2 votes
0 votes
196 views
7 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_3tUpTbUNDbwCw
replied
user profile

Thanks Brian,

Sadly this does not explain how the Reviews to Sales ratio could have fallen so dramatically from Feb 25. I would understand it if it went down 50%, or 200%- but 1300%?! Same product, same service. Something is not right.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
14 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
Safe-T Claim Denied...
by Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko

A £200 product was returned damaged; the buyer used their own carrier, got compensation from them, and then requested a full refund from Amazon. The SAFE-T claim team denied reimbursement without explanation, and there is no way to question their decision. This is almost 5th claim from this team to deny without any reason. This poor service is going to lead us to stop being a Prime fulfilment seller. What is point being into this program and have limited carrier options, pay high rates to the prime carriers, fulfil the order as a priority and then pay the customers from our pocket.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
8 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
SAFE T claim denied wrongly
by Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko

A £200 product was returned damaged; the buyer used their own carrier, got compensation from them, and then requested a full refund from Amazon. The SAFE-T claim team denied reimbursement without explanation, and there is no way to question their decision. This is almost 5th claim from this team to deny without any reason. This poor service is going to lead us to stop being a Prime fulfilment seller. What is point being into this program and have limited carrier options, pay high rates to the prime carriers, fulfil the order as a priority and then pay the customers from our pocket.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
10 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
SAFE-T Claim denied as there is an RMA
by Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko

A £200 product was returned damaged; the buyer used their own carrier, got compensation from them, and then requested a full refund from Amazon. The SAFE-T claim team denied reimbursement without explanation, and there is no way to question their decision. This is almost 5th claim from this team to deny without any reason. This poor service is going to lead us to stop being a Prime fulfilment seller. What is the point being into this program and have limited carrier options, pay high rates to the prime carriers, fulfil the orders as a priority and then pay the customers from our pocket, such a shame

1 vote
0 votes
0 views
5 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko
replied
user profile
SAFE T Claim complaint
by Seller_XFH5a9uW8sEko

A £200 product was returned damaged; the buyer used their own carrier, got compensation from them, and then requested a full refund from Amazon. The SAFE-T claim team denied reimbursement without explanation, and there is no way to question their decision. This poor service is going to lead us to stop being a Prime fulfilment seller.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
12 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_aw46PzfsCWh3F
user profile
Wrong Toy policy Compliance Warning
by Seller_aw46PzfsCWh3F
Amazon replied

Hi everyone,

I’m facing a serious issue with Toy Policy Compliance Warnings and I’m hoping someone here has a workable solution.

I currently have **over 200 warnings**, even though **none of these products are toys**. The number keeps increasing every day.

I’ve appealed every single warning, but all appeals are rejected instantly with what looks like an automated response. There’s no indication that anyone is actually reviewing the listings.

I also contacted Seller Support for each ASIN, but the replies are the same — “not accepted” — even when I clearly explain that the items are not toys. If someone simply looked at the products, it would be obvious.

This process is extremely inefficient. I’m spending hours every day repeating the same explanation, and I’m worried about how many ASINs might get deactivated if this continues. At this rate, it feels like my entire inventory could end up with warnings.

Is there any effective way to escalate this or speak with someone who can properly review these cases? Any guidance would be appreciated.

1 vote
0 votes
245 views
14 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_Z6JEwkZB24rWj
replied
user profile
Wrong Toy policy Compliance Warning
by Seller_Z6JEwkZB24rWj

Hello @Sunny_Graphics,


This is Jonathan from Amazon and I want to provide you with some guidance based on your post.


Thank you for your guidance, Jonathan. These are personalised printed occasion banners, not toys. The product images shown in the warning interface already make this evident, but unfortunately, I'm unable to upload additional photos or documents during the appeal process.

Based on my observations from your post, I want to provide you with a sense of direction moving forward. I can see that you've been working diligently to address these warnings and have already had success with approximately 10 ASINs being approved through Seller Support review, which confirms that your products are correctly classified as celebration décor rather than toys.


The situation you're experiencing appears to be related to how Amazon's automated systems are interpreting certain keywords in your listings. Words like "birthday," "party," or "children" are contextually appropriate for adult celebration banners, but they may be triggering toy safety compliance checks.


Since your products are flat printed banners without any interactive features, toy-like components, or child-targeted design elements, they shouldn't fall under the EU Toy Safety Directive requirements.


For the remaining flagged ASINs, continue providing your information through the button next to each warning on your Account Health page. In your responses, emphasize that these are personalized printed occasion banners designed for adult-organized celebrations, they are flat printed posters without interactive or toy-like features, they contain no packaging or components that present safety risks associated with children's toys, and they are appropriately categorized in the Lawn and Garden section as celebration décor.


Since the appeal interface has limitations on uploading additional documentation, focus on crafting clear written descriptions that explain each product's intended use, target audience, and design characteristics. For the submissions you've already sent through Seller Support that haven't received replies yet, those are likely still under review.


I'm curious about a few details that might help provide more specific guidance. Do all 200+ flagged ASINs share similar listing structures or keywords, or are they spread across different product variations? Have you noticed whether certain phrases in your titles or bullet points appear more frequently in the flagged listings compared to the 10 that were successfully approved? Understanding these patterns might help you prioritize which listings to address first and how to refine your responses.


You can find more information about the EU Toy Safety Directive requirements here:

https://sellercentral.amazon.co.uk/help/hub/reference/external/G200686210


The forums community and I are here to support you. Please let us know how we can help you from this point forward.


Regards,

Jonathan

0 votes
1 vote
0 views
14 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_Fg2fqaWOnEtha
user profile

I was selling a product that I sourced from the official UK distributor. I’ve now been accused of selling inauthentic items, even though the stock is genuine.

The issue is that not all of my invoices fall within the date range Amazon is asking for (17/12/2024 to 16/12/2025). I purchased a large quantity in October and November 2024 to prepare for the Christmas period, and those units were then sold over the following months. Amazon appears to be excluding any stock bought before 17/12/2024, so the figures they calculate don’t match my sales volume within their window.

Has anyone found a solution for this situation? My account health has gone just over 200 because I received two high penalties relating to this product, and I’m concerned about the impact on my account.

@Seller_VygaQRBv4Ssmh @Seller_FJwyF3iu5qxUY @Seller_CnfW62x6yxvJw

0 votes
0 votes
28 views
2 replies
Latest activity