Get over £42K in potential incentives when you start selling with Amazon. Learn how
Get over £42K in potential incentives when you start selling with Amazon. Learn how
    Seller Forums
    ForumsHomeDiscussionsGroups
    ForumsHomeDiscussionsGroups

    Results for "탤ㄹㄱ램 banonpi 선불폰유심사는곳정보 바넌피선불유심내구제 대학생모바일대출 직장인소액급전내구제 2026년당진시연체자소액급전대출해주는곳"

    (239 results)
    user profile
    Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
    ∙replied
    user profile
    Seller_qgA4zw3CPgxGO
    ∙
    user profile
    Seller_8hQgfj6OVZYse
    ∙replied
    user profile
    Seller_9itqTygzquSd5
    ∙
    user profile
    Seller_fUMaZCCjPKvC6
    ∙
    user profile
    Seller_V8Poonc7yoRuN
    ∙
    user profile
    Seller_eon8Z1nTmcjR6
    ∙replied
    user profile
    Seller_jucuK4xvuHzTF
    ∙
    user profile
    News_Amazon
    ∙
    user profile
    Seller_Hz6zI7z2oNRyc
    ∙
    Sort by
    RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
    Filters
    Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
    Quick filters
    Discussions
    Categories
    Tags
    Tags will populate based on category selection

    Results for "탤ㄹㄱ램 banonpi 선불폰유심사는곳정보 바넌피선불유심내구제 대학생모바일대출 직장인소액급전내구제 2026년당진시연체자소액급전대출해주는곳"

    (239 results)
    user profile
    Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
    ∙replied
    user profile
    Japan regulator is asking sellers about Amazon “competitive price” and Buy Box access
    by Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J

    I think the deeper issue is that Amazon may have designed a pricing tool that compares the number, but not the real price.

    A price is not only the physical value of the product.

    It also includes logistics cost, labour cost, storage cost, fulfilment route, inflation, tax, delivery speed, stock risk, return risk, and whether the offer is actually sustainable.

    If an ASIN has a price history going back 10 or 15 years, the system should not treat an old number as equal to a current market price. Timestamp matters.

    A £5 price from 2010 is not the same economic price as £5 in 2026.

    The same applies to external comparisons. If another retailer is selling at a loss, clearing old stock, liquidating, or using the product as a temporary promotion, that should not automatically become the “correct” price for every seller on Amazon.

    A seller should still be able to sell at a healthy, sustainable price.

    Then buyers can make their own judgement.

    If the buyer chooses the cheaper external retailer, the Amazon seller loses the sale. That is normal competition.

    But if Amazon removes Featured Offer eligibility because of an opaque comparator, the seller may lose visibility, sales and business access without knowing what evidence was used.

    That is the difference.

    The issue is not whether Amazon should stop price gouging.

    The issue is whether an automated system is reducing price to a single number, while ignoring time, cost, availability, fulfilment, market context and sustainability.

    0 votes
    0 votes
    0 views
    4 replies
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_qgA4zw3CPgxGO
    ∙
    user profile
    EVRI FRAUDULENT ADJUSTMENTS AFTER USING THE AMAZON BUY SHIPPING - AMAZON ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN
    by Seller_qgA4zw3CPgxGO
    Amazon replied

    Again today I have £37 of additional shipping charges paid out of my account to Evri for their fraudulent adjustments of parcel weight and dimensions. This needs to stop as it only happens on Amazon - Packlink never do this? So how is it that it keeps happening to thousands on Amazon?

    Contacted seller support via chat which was a waste of time as always is and was told to contact Evri myself?????

    Absolutely furious as its neverending .... All my dimensions are correct and carrier states the same? WHY DOES NO-ONE AT AMAZON CHECK THIS BEFORE PAYING AS CLEARLY THEY KNOW THERES A BIG PROBLEM WITH SELLERS BEING INCORRECTLY OVERCHARGED? EXAMPLE BELOW OF WHICH I HAVE 6 THE SAME AND THEN A FURTHER CHARGE OF £12.00 FOR ANOTHER PARCEL THEY CLAIM IS 5KG WHEN THE ITEM IS 1.2KG AND GOES OUT BUBBLEWRAPPED? SOUL DESTROYING

    Transaction date: 26/04/2026

    Tax:

    Customer-Entered Dimensions: 61 X 46 X 46 CM

    Weight: 500 G

    Carrier-Audited Dimensions: 61 X 46 X 46 CM

    Weight: 500 G

    Other chargeback

    -£4.16

    Other chargeback

    -£0.83

    Amount already paid:

    £2.95

    Total Charge from Carrier

    -£5.99

    Revised Tax from Carrier

    -£0.51

    Other

    Carrier delivery label adjustment due to under-charged delivery label:

    -£2.53

    Transaction Total

    -£3.04

    2 votes
    0 votes
    380 views
    18 replies
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_8hQgfj6OVZYse
    ∙replied
    user profile
    deferred transactions
    by Seller_8hQgfj6OVZYse

    Hello @Seller_UuWfCIhLlp3t5,

    With the change to DD+7, funds from orders are held until seven days after the order delivery date. Some sellers may see their transactions displayed at an account-level reserve, rather than as individual deferred transactions, while we complete rollout of transaction-level visibility to deferrals.

    Account Level Reserve (ALR) traditionally holds funds for refunds, claims, and chargebacks, but may temporarily include DD+7 transactions as we transition our system. This means sellers may see an increase in account-level reserve balances without corresponding transaction-level visibility. This does not impact when funds are released. Funds will continue to be released seven days after order delivery date and applied to the available balance as per Payments based on delivery date.

    We are actively working to complete rollout so that DD+7 transactions are consistently visible at a transaction level. We appreciate your patience as we complete this transition and apologize for any confusion caused.

    We also recommend that sellers review the Payment Date Range Transaction and Summary Reports help page, which includes details on the February–March 2026 reporting enhancements rollout.

    Regards,

    - Manny

    0 votes
    0 votes
    0 views
    2 replies
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_9itqTygzquSd5
    ∙
    user profile
    FBA shipments that have been stuck in RECEIVING status
    by Seller_9itqTygzquSd5

    I have two FBA shipments that have been stuck in RECEIVING status for an unusually long time, both exceeding the normal receiving timeframe of 3-5 business days, and this is impacting my ability to fulfill Prime orders and causing potential lost sales. Shipment 1: Shipment ID FBA15LS2DNM1, 20 brushes, created May 8, 2026, Fulfillment Center BHX4, currently in RECEIVING status for 11 days with an expected completion of May 13-15, 2026. Shipment 2: Shipment ID FBA15LRBG2QW, 86 brushes, created May 10, 2026, Fulfillment Center LBA4, currently in RECEIVING status for 9 days with an expected completion of May 15-17, 2026. I am requesting urgent investigation into the processing delays for both shipments, estimated completion dates, and guidance on any actions I can take from my side to expedite processing. The Prime badge is currently not available, which is directly affecting my business operations.

    0 votes
    0 votes
    5 views
    1 reply
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_fUMaZCCjPKvC6
    ∙
    user profile
    URGENT: Shipping Template Not Propagating to Live Listings — Confirmed Offer Publication Failure — SFP Compliance Risk This Weekend
    by Seller_fUMaZCCjPKvC6
    Amazon replied

    Hi all,

    I'm hoping a moderator or someone who has experienced this can help, as Seller Support has been unable to resolve this after 6 days.

    THE ISSUE IN PLAIN ENGLISH

    My Seller Central inventory shows the correct shipping template and price. My customers are seeing a different (old) shipping template and price on the live Amazon listing. The backend and the live listing are out of sync and nothing I do will fix it.

    HOW I KNOW THIS IS AN OFFER PUBLICATION ISSUE (NOT A FEED ISSUE)

    I proved this conclusively today. I updated a single SKU via Price & Quantity feed. It processed in under 1 minute. Seller Central immediately showed the correct new price and correct (non-Prime) shipping template. The live customer-facing listing took 12 minutes to show the new price — and the shipping template still hasn't updated at all.

    The same feed type, with the same background errors that have always been there, successfully updated our shipping templates every week for 18 months. Until 8 May 2026.

    WHAT I HAVE TRIED

    - Flat file feed uploads — process successfully, template does not propagate

    - Manual edits via Seller Central UI — save successfully, do not propagate to live listing

    - Bulk inventory actions (Update Shipping Template) — register in the backend, do not propagate

    - Price & Quantity feed — prices eventually propagate (with delay), shipping template field does not

    WHAT TRIGGERED THIS

    On Friday 8 May I uploaded a batch of ~3,000 SKUs to switch shipping templates. At the same time, GS1's platform was experiencing an outage. I received error 8566 (GTIN/SKU mismatch) on multiple SKUs during that window. The 8566 errors have since disappeared, but the listings appear to remain in a stuck state from the failed GTIN verification.

    WHAT SELLER SUPPORT HAS DONE

    Six days of back-and-forth on case 12568519752. Every response has focused on feed errors (8541 brand conflict, 300060 image URL, 100907 compliance media) that have existed on our account for months and were never a problem before. Support has not acknowledged or addressed the offer publication failure at all.

    WHY THIS IS URGENT

    Several hundred of our best-selling ASINs are stuck showing Prime to customers. I have no team available to ship on Saturday. If this isn't resolved by tomorrow (Friday 15 May) I will receive Prime orders I cannot fulfil, risking SFP violations. I have tried every available workaround — none of them work on Prime orders without either disabling Prime entirely (which destroys our delivery promise) or requiring Amazon's technical team to intervene.

    WHAT I NEED

    Escalation to the Offer Publication / Catalogue Propagation / Prime Promise technical team to force-republish the affected offers. This cannot be fixed from the seller side.

    Can any moderators help escalate case 12568519752 to the correct technical team as a matter of urgency? Has any sellers experienced this before and how did you solve it please?

    Thanks

    Joe

    0 votes
    0 votes
    4 views
    1 reply
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_V8Poonc7yoRuN
    ∙
    user profile
    Banned After Following Amazon's Own Instructions - £8K+ VAT Demand for Money Already Paid to HMRC
    by Seller_V8Poonc7yoRuN

    15 months. 10+ submissions. Finally told the specific issue in May 2026 - address mismatch. Fixed it same day. Banned anyway.

    UK resident. VAT registered. Paying HMRC every quarter since day one. Amazon now wants £8K+ for VAT already paid. Disbursements frozen. Can't access my own money.

    Did exactly what their own support team told me to do. Got banned for it.

    @Cooper_Amazon @Manny_Amazon @Topher_Amazon @Sandy_Amazon @Bryce_Amazon @TaylorR_Amazon @Joey_Amazon @Kai_Amazon

    Can someone please look into this.

    0 votes
    0 votes
    8 views
    0 replies
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_eon8Z1nTmcjR6
    ∙replied
    user profile
    🔍 Spotted an Incorrect Charge? Here's What to Do
    by Seller_eon8Z1nTmcjR6

    Hello @Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV

    Case ID: 12467959572 - Work in progress

    I'm extra charged for Evri parcels ,, Adjustments,, between 26/04/2026 and 29/04/2026. These new charges have now affected a total of 347 parcels and have caused financial losses of £1,028.88.

    Thank you for any help

    Anna

    0 votes
    0 votes
    0 views
    12 replies
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_jucuK4xvuHzTF
    ∙
    user profile
    Amazon is becoming unappealing place to sell
    by Seller_jucuK4xvuHzTF

    I would imagine our experience is similar to many other sellers in that return rates on Amazon are extremely high, which also seems difficult to reconcile with Amazon’s environmental and sustainability messaging.

    One issue we are struggling to understand is the inconsistency in the returns process. When customers open a return request, the majority are provided with a prepaid return label, while others are only provided with a return address label — even when the products are identical. We would appreciate clarification as to why this happens.

    More concerningly, a customer recently opened an A-to-z claim after being provided with only an address label by Amazon. Within a few hours, we supplied the customer with a prepaid return label ourselves in order to resolve the matter promptly. Despite this, Amazon issued the customer with a full refund without requiring the item to be returned.

    We are trying to understand whether there is something incorrect within our return settings or processes, or whether this is now simply standard Amazon policy and procedure in 2026.

    4 votes
    0 votes
    213 views
    6 replies
    Latest activity
    user profile
    News_Amazon
    ∙
    user profile
    Updated payment reports simplify accrual reporting for delivery-date-based reserves
    by News_Amazon

    We’ve heard your feedback about how reports that are only based on payout timing have made accrual reconciliation more difficult, especially when some transactions are deferred.

    We’re gradually rolling out updates to the Date Range Transaction and Summary reports for the following stores: Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, India, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates and the UK. This rollout began on March 23, 2026, and it will continue until May 31, 2026.

    This change applies to the following users:

    • Sellers who are subject to delivery-date-based reserve policies
    • Developers who access transaction reports through the reports API

    The updated reports will provide a clearer view of accrued earnings for month-end reconciliation and financial reporting.

    By May 31, when you request a Transaction or Summary report for a period beginning on January 1, 2025, you’ll notice three key improvements:

    • All posted transactions are in one place. Your reports will include both transactions that have already been released to your balance and transactions that have been deferred under delivery-date-based policies. You must no longer download separate deferred transaction reports to view deferred activity.
    • Activity is indexed by the posted date. The Date/Time column in Transaction reports will reflect the transaction posted date, rather than the release date, or the payout eligibility date. This posted date provides a more consistent view of activity during the period that you select.
    • You have clear visibility into deferred versus released statuses in the same report. There will be a new column in Transaction reports that shows whether a transaction has been deferred or released. An additional column, Transaction Release Date, will indicate when the transaction was released. If a transaction remains deferred, the release date field will be blank.

    If you have existing integrations with third-party financial systems, we recommend that you update your mappings or scripts. Note that reports for periods before January 1, 2025, will continue to follow the prior format. We plan to roll out similar reporting updates for additional stores by June 30, 2026.

    To view your reports, follow these steps:

    1. Go to Payments and select Reports Repository.
    2. Under Account type, select All (Unified Reports).
    3. Under Report type, select Summary or Transaction.
    4. Set the start date in the Reporting date range as January 1, 2025, or later.
    5. Click Request report.

    1 vote
    0 votes
    66 views
    1 reply
    Latest activity
    user profile
    Seller_Hz6zI7z2oNRyc
    ∙
    user profile
    Amazon Buy Shipping Used & SFP SAFE-T Claim Appeal Denied for Carrier Delay
    by Seller_Hz6zI7z2oNRyc
    Amazon replied

    @Seller_VygaQRBv4Ssmh@Seller_QTT5oP45IFvQZ@Seller_WIFV02H2XUFgS@Seller_t9kvdr2yixQej@Seller_zukQNO61PzGck@Seller_xkwDczt8sPSmx@Seller_khUF6HPR2AHxu@Seller_FJwyF3iu5qxUY@Seller_Z6JEwkZB24rWj@Seller_CnfW62x6yxvJw@Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob@Seller_8hQgfj6OVZYse@Seller_WD80mtpYHjvBN@Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV@Seller_PIHyltK09pbl3@Seller_YeWcEeTwlVO93@Seller_42px4plXqA66A@Seller_hme3Wbydd1ihr@Seller_dnxnrsZIeTNo3@Seller_9Kb3jdNMszN2C@Seller_MjP2XhEPPzQTG

    Hello Amazon Moderator, I am requesting assistance with a denied SAFE-T claim for an SFP order where I have met all policy requirements.

    Order ID:205-5860782-7843557 / SAFE-T Claim ID: 72193-33979-7923348

    The Issue: The claim and subsequent appeal were denied for "Late Delivery." However, this delay was entirely on the carrier's side.

    Evidence of Policy Compliance: The label was purchased through Amazon buy shipping.

    On-Time Shipment: The "Ship By" date was [Tue, 3 Mar 2026 GMT]. The carrier's first scan occurred on [Tue, 3 Mar 2026, 21:25 BST], confirming on-time dispatch.

    Carrier Delay: Tracking shows the package was delayed at the [EVRI] facility on [Wed, 4 Mar 2026, 08:18 BST]

    Per Amazon’s Buy Shipping Protection Policy, sellers are protected against delivery-related issues (including delays and late delivery claims) when shipping on time via Buy Shipping.

    Can a community manager please review this case? The automated system is currently disregarding the Buy Shipping protection policy.

    Thank you.

    0 votes
    0 votes
    10 views
    1 reply
    Latest activity