Seller Forums

Results for "탤래 tsbusim 선불폰유심20만원소액내구제 신용불량자연체자대출 탬스뷰 선불유심 내구제 최대회선 경상북도최고가격매입문의 앱테크소액추천"

(162 results)
user profile
Seller_5uBYL2LFkHdQM
user profile
Seller_SnOCWghkxvh9k
replied
user profile
Seller_dpJ77kRWnnEqt
replied
user profile
Seller_QgnlRdJJaJLON
replied
user profile
Seller_nuwYoqPjqDnhD
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
replied
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
user profile
Seller_MjP2XhEPPzQTG
replied
user profile
Seller_5S24UsCBMtGIx
user profile
Seller_IQ2W4mfECSy9V
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags
Tags will populate based on category selection

Results for "탤래 tsbusim 선불폰유심20만원소액내구제 신용불량자연체자대출 탬스뷰 선불유심 내구제 최대회선 경상북도최고가격매입문의 앱테크소액추천"

(162 results)
user profile
Seller_5uBYL2LFkHdQM
user profile
Royal Mail Delays after Easter Weekend
by Seller_5uBYL2LFkHdQM

Hi

This hasn't happened to us before so I would appreciate any advice anyone can offer.

We sent orders placed over the bank holiday weekend on the 7th March. About 20 or so orders sent via Royal Mail were collected from us on the 7th but not scanned by Royal Mail until the 10th or 11th April, so they're showing as late deliveries and this has put us 'at risk'. Orders sent afterward seem to be delivering as usual so I think it's either Royal Mail issue or bank holiday back log, both of which is out of our control.

Help!

0 votes
0 votes
15 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_SnOCWghkxvh9k
replied
user profile

Here is a quote from the OTDR policy that may reassure you: 'Sellers with fewer than 20 shipped units within the 14-day measurement period are also exempt from OTDR requirements.'

1 vote
0 votes
0 views
18 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_dpJ77kRWnnEqt
replied
user profile

Hello @Seller_p940Jehgj1NWn,

Thanks for sharing that Order ID. I've had a chance to look into this.

Unfortunately, the carrier data shows the first scan entering the network was on 21 Nov, which falls after the required Ship By date of 20 Nov. That's what our system uses to determine the ship date, and it's why the claim was denied under the SAFE-T policy.

I know that's not the answer you were hoping for, and I understand the frustration. For future orders, it's worth confirming with your courier that parcels are scanned and accepted on the same day as pickup — that scan timestamp is what determines eligibility when using Buy Shipping.

- Ram

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
11 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_QgnlRdJJaJLON
replied
user profile

It is illegal price fixing by Amazon.

I had a product that sold on FBA for £7.99. Amazon decided that it "lost Featured Offer eligibility due to "uncompetitive price."

Amazon's recommended price was £1.99 !!!!!!!!!!!!! The FBA fee was over £2, I had to buy the product, add a barcode label and ship it to Amazon and pay the 20% VAT and 15% Amazon fees on the sale price.

This has to be an illegal practise.

3 votes
0 votes
0 views
9 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_nuwYoqPjqDnhD
user profile

Hi everyone,

I wanted to raise this publicly as I am currently experiencing a serious issue with an FBA shipment and I am not confident it will be resolved quickly through standard Seller Support.

The situation:

I sent a shipment of 236 units to an Amazon fulfilment centre. Upon Amazon receiving the parcel, the ASIN was marked as buyable before the individual units had been scanned and checked in. Acting in good faith, I began running paid advertising campaigns once the product appeared live and available, which generated 20 customer orders.

It has now been 4 days since those first orders were placed (including a weekend), and the inventory still shows as FC Processing. Amazon has not completed the check-in of the units received, meaning none of the 20 customer orders have been fulfilled.

The core problem:

Amazon's systems marked the inventory as buyable prematurely, before the check-in process was complete. I had no way of knowing the units were not actually ready to ship. I ran ads in good faith, customers ordered, and now those orders are sitting unfulfilled through no fault of my own.

My concerns:

Late Shipment Rate, Cancellation Rate, and Order Defect Rate are all at risk of being impacted despite this being an Amazon-side delay.

Significant advertising spend has been wasted driving orders that cannot currently be fulfilled.

Customer experience is being damaged, which could lead to negative feedback on my account.

I have raised a support case and am awaiting a response, but given the urgency, I wanted to ask:

Has anyone else experienced this issue where FBA inventory is made purchasable before check-in is complete?

Were Amazon willing to protect your account health metrics when the delay was caused by their own systems?

Did escalating via the forums help get things resolved faster?

Any advice or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated. I am hoping that raising this publicly also helps draw attention from Amazon moderators who may be able to escalate internally.

Thank you.

0 votes
0 votes
11 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
replied
user profile

I had a similar case a few times.

In one of mine, the shipment took about 4 weeks to check in fully, but an order still came through the day after I dropped the shipment at the drop-off point.

I contacted Seller Support at the time and was told it would not affect my metrics. I was also told that if the buyer could not wait, they would cancel the order.

So based on my own experience, the early order can happen before the inbound process is fully completed. In my case I did not run any advertising, so I cannot really comment on the ad spend side of it.

I would still wait for Support’s reply on your case, especially because your situation includes 20 orders and paid ads, which makes the impact much bigger.

0 votes
0 votes
0 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_kSZCywEhJQQ8J
user profile

Hi everyone,

Like many sellers, my sales have been worse than last year.

I only sell on Amazon, so I do not have eBay, a physical shop, or another channel to compare against directly.

At first, I assumed the main reasons were broader UK economic pressure, inflation, and weaker demand. That may still be part of it.

But after switching from FBA to FBM, I started paying much closer attention to individual orders, customer messages, and what buyers thought they had selected.

That made me wonder whether some sales problems are not only about demand, price, ads, or seasonality.

They may also involve buyer-side friction in how Amazon presents listings, options, variations, or default selections.

A few examples from my own orders:

  • A buyer thought she had bought one white zip, but later found she had actually ordered five off-white zips.I do not know exactly how Amazon presented the product on her side, but similar colours, grouped options, or selection flow may have contributed.
  • Another buyer wanted a 22-inch zip pack, but had actually ordered the default 14-inch zip instead.Seller Support later confirmed this was a UI issue.
  • A customer wanted to buy deep plum purple zips in both 20 inch and 22 inch to test which size suited her project.She was able to find the 22 inch single-zip listing, but not the 20 inch single-zip listing, even though when I checked it from my side, the 20 inch listing appeared normal.
  • I have also seen two duplicate-order cases where the first reaction was to assume customer error, but later a moderator confirmed there was a backend issue. That made me more cautious about treating all unusual ordering behaviour as simple buyer mistake.
  • In another case, a buyer thought she had bought two 20-inch zips, but had actually ordered two packs of 5 zip bundles in the same colour group, and in 16 inch, not 20 inch. What makes this more interesting is that these were not only different sizes, but belonged to different parent listings. That makes me wonder whether app or browser display can sometimes make nearby products look more interchangeable than they really are.

So I am starting to think that sales drop may be more complicated than many sellers assume.

It may not be only:

  • lower demand
  • weaker economy
  • more competition
  • ads becoming less efficient

It may also involve:

  • unstable product display
  • catalogue changes
  • variation / listing presentation issues
  • inconsistent visibility between what sellers see and what buyers actually see in browser or app
  • default selections leading buyers into the wrong item

I am not claiming this is the main cause of all sales drops, and I know some cases will still be normal buyer error, weaker demand, or competition. My point is that buyer-side display and selection friction may be an under-recognised factor that sellers cannot easily see from their own side.

I would be especially interested in hearing from sellers who have seen:

- buyers saying they thought they selected one option but received another ordered option,

- child listings that appear normal to the seller but seem hard for buyers to find,

- confirmed UI / variation / backend issues that later affected orders or conversions,

- or drops in conversion where impressions and clicks stayed fairly normal.

What makes me think this matters is that, if buyer-side display or selection friction is real, sellers may be trying to solve the wrong problem. More ads, more keywords, or listing tweaks will not fix a buying path where the buyer is being shown, defaulted into, or guided toward the wrong option. A listing can look active and normal from Seller Central, but that is not the same as knowing how it is actually being surfaced and selected on buyer browser, buyer app, or mobile view.

1 vote
0 votes
20 views
0 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_MjP2XhEPPzQTG
replied
user profile

Hello AliedSNA,

This is Zyan from Amazon, and I am here to assist you.

I understand you have submitted 20 appeals providing examples and evidence of how your account has complied with Amazon policy. Every appeal has been rejected and you are now at a standstill as you are unable to call Account Health because the functionality has stopped working for you. You are receiving communication that your account cannot be reactivated as the team could not validate documentation submitted during the appeals process, even though the evidence submitted including Letters of Authorization are all genuine.

I want to acknowledge your frustration and thank you for your persistence in submitting multiple appeals with genuine documentation. I truly understand how exhausting and stressful this situation has become after 20 appeal attempts.

I want to educate you on an important point. There is no direct escalation path available through the Seller Forums for account reactivation cases. The Account Health team is the only team authorized to review appeals and make reactivation decisions based on the documentation provided.

Since your appeals have been rejected with the response that the team could not validate the documentation submitted, I recommend you take the following approach for your next appeal:

  • Review the Performance Notification carefully to understand the exact reason why the documentation was not validated
  • If the Letters of Authorization are genuine, ensure they include all required elements: official letterhead, clear authorization statement, contact information of the authorizing party, date of authorization, and specific product categories covered
  • In addition to Letters of Authorization, provide supporting invoices from authorized suppliers showing actual purchases of the products, as authorization letters alone may not be sufficient
  • Submit a detailed explanation addressing why previous documentation may not have been validated and what additional evidence you are now providing

Since the Account Health call functionality has stopped working for you, please continue submitting appeals through the Account Health page with comprehensive documentation and clear explanations.

The community and I are here to support you. Please review your documentation against Amazon's requirements and submit your next appeal with additional supporting evidence beyond the Letters of Authorization.

Regards,

Zyan


0 votes
1 vote
0 views
52 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_5S24UsCBMtGIx
user profile

Spoken to a few other sellers who are all paying less than me when it comes to UPS partnered rates on amazon for inbound shipments wondering what others are paying for a 20-23kg Parcel atm, mine is £6.28 for a parcel that is 21.8kg & 40 x 60 x 50

0 votes
0 votes
13 views
1 reply
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_IQ2W4mfECSy9V
user profile
Urgent Attention Needed
by Seller_IQ2W4mfECSy9V
Amazon replied

Dear Amazon Seller Performance Team,

I am writing to urgently escalate my account review, which has now exceeded the timeline committed to me during my verification interview.

📋 TIMELINE OF EVENTS

• 21 February 2026 — Received notification that my account would be deactivated on 07/03/26 if I did not complete a video verification interview within 14 days.

• 5 March 2026 — I attended the video verification interview and answered all questions in full. The session lasted approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes.

• During the interview, I was told a final decision would be issued within 5 business days.

• 22 & 25 March 2026 — Received automated performance notifications stating my account remains under review. No substantive update has been provided.

• Today, 9 April 2026 — 40 days have passed since the interview with no final decision.

⚠️ CURRENT IMPACT

My account payments are on hold and my business operations are completely frozen. Every additional day without a resolution causes significant and compounding financial harm to my business.

📌 MY REQUEST

I respectfully request the following:

1. An immediate escalation of my account review to a senior specialist.

2. A confirmed timeline for when a final decision will be issued.

3. Urgent release of my held payments, or confirmation of the conditions required for their release.

I have cooperated fully and in good faith throughout this process — attending a lengthy interview and providing complete answers to all questions asked. I trust that Amazon will honour the 5-business-day commitment made during the interview and resolve this matter without further delay.

Please treat this as a matter of urgency.

Sincerely,

Zahid Aslam

Would anyone from Amazon team help me out to resolve this issue @Seller_z3k8APxGfbQEK @Seller_VJ4XoAkjDpjPH @Seller_hnDMgUKxMh1V4 @Seller_fgtTzyHQfOM1x @Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN @Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP @Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4 @Seller_TSXM2A5nxWSuH @Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV @Seller_1NuhiUvRIqDl7

1 vote
0 votes
25 views
4 replies
Latest activity