YES YOU READ RIGHT GOT A TO Z AND ODR AFTER I REFUNDED I GUESS ITS A FIRST. THERE IS ZERO RULES OR POLICY WHEN AMAZON SEES THE PUNNISH SELLERS.
I am asking for moderator assistance, because this A-to-Z claim should never have existed and is damaging my ODR unfairly.
Order ID: 206-9326319-8547518
Courier: Evri
Estimated delivery: 9 December 2025
Actual delivery: 8 December 2025 (EARLY)
Proof: Courier photo + GPS confirmation
Facts (no opinion, only evidence)
• The parcel was delivered one day earlier than the estimated delivery date
• Evri provided delivery photo and GPS confirmation
• The customer later stated the parcel was stolen after delivery
• This is not “not received”, it is post-delivery theft
The customer literally confirms this in writing.
Critical issue
Despite all of the above, Amazon Customer Service instructed me to refund, which I did in full on 10 December.
AFTER I refunded, Amazon systems allowed the customer to open an A-to-Z Guarantee claim anyway.
This should not happen.
Amazon policy is clear that A-to-Z claims are not valid once a seller has already refunded the order.
Yet:
• The claim was opened
• The claim was closed as “refunded by seller”
• A defect was still applied to my ODR
This makes sellers look like a freebies shop with unlimited stock, where customers get:
Delivery
Theft after delivery
Refund
A-to-Z claim on top
And sellers pay twice.
Why this is wrong
• Delivered early, not late
• Confirmed delivery with photo + GPS
• Customer admits stolen after delivery
• Full refund issued before A-to-Z
• No seller fault, no breach, no delay
This is purely an Amazon process failure, not seller performance.
@Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV @Seller_ZyGdB49sb7An4 @Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP @Seller_j9Bd91CW3ZVpr @Seller_YeWcEeTwlVO93
@Seller_l3eCP9f1PtJXC @Seller_lmwzklfLOK2Ob @Seller_DNQGSsdC7DccM @Seller_z3k8APxGfbQEK @Seller_TSXM2A5nxWSuH @Seller_fgtTzyHQfOM1x @Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP @Seller_VJ4XoAkjDpjPH @Seller_b91S9zQ2eKxLt @Seller_Rv3kmJHEUMGJH @Seller_gAhPNiLrkfTcr