Dear Spencer,
Thank you for your response.
I’m writing with urgency and growing concern regarding an A-Z claim that has been wrongly decided, despite overwhelming evidence supporting our case. This matter is not just about one order—it speaks to how disheartened and demoralised sellers like ourselves feel when Amazon’s processes appear to disregard clear facts and prior correspondence. I am respectfully urging you to escalate this matter directly to John Boumphrey’s department so they can fully understand the implications of what’s happening on the ground.
Let me be absolutely clear:
Buyer Agreed to Delay: The buyer was advised that delivery would be two days later than originally expected. We have documented messages from the buyer explicitly agreeing to this and confirming they were happy to proceed. They were also given the option to cancel but chose not to.
Confirmed Delivery by DPD: The item was delivered on the agreed revised date. DPD has provided:
The name of the person who accepted the parcel.
A photograph of the package being delivered at the correct address.
A prior delivery photo at the same location showing the same person, the same door, the same products, and the same interior wall plug—making it absolutely clear that this was the correct recipient and address.
No Dispute from Buyer Post-Delivery: We received no messages or complaints from the many communications we made directly after delivery, totally ignored.
Internal Confirmation from Amazon Specialists: Two account specialists have already reviewed this order and confirmed that we acted appropriately throughout. I have these confirmations in writing and am happy to forward them upon request.
Despite all of this, the A-Z Guarantee claim has been found against us. This outcome is both unjust and damaging. It undermines trust in the seller support structure, and it frankly leaves us questioning the integrity of the dispute resolution process.
Spencer, with full respect, we do not appreciate being treated as if we are new or inexperienced in this space. We are simply asking for a fair and objective review based on facts, not assumptions. The A-Z team in this instance has failed to apply basic due diligence, and this is why I’m asking—once again—for this case to be elevated directly to Mr. Boumphrey’s office.
Please confirm receipt and let us know how you will proceed.