Assistance Needed: Resolving Trademark Text Misuse Notice and Related Questions

Countries

Read only
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Egypt
France
Germany
India
Italy
Japan
Mexico
Netherlands
Poland
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Spain
Sweden
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
United Kingdom
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_3NCHziIdLTgWV

Assistance Needed: Resolving Trademark Text Misuse Notice and Related Questions

Hello, @Angie_Amazon @Winston_Amazon @Simon_Amazon @Abella_AMZ @Julia_Amazon @Sakura_Amazon_ @Glenn_Amazon, @Manny_Amazon, @Nano_Amazon, @Josh_Amazon @Atlas_Amazon @Michelle_Amazon @Rose_Amazon, @Jon_Amazon @Roberto_Amazon @Cooper_Amazon @Joey_Amazon

I am seeking advice and support to resolve a Trademark Text Misuse notice issued to my account on November 26. I would greatly appreciate any guidance from experienced sellers or Amazon support representatives regarding the situation. Here are the key details and questions:

Background:

I received a Trademark Text Misuse notice for allegedly infringing the FRONTLINE trademark.

The notice affected the following ASINs: B09WKWQCR7, B09Y4NYWSX, B09Z9RYVV5, B09WKGGQKS, B09Y4N7KF1, B0B42M7NB2, B09Y4QDRSH, B09Y4NJQ36, B0B42LH62Y.

Of these listings, only two (B0B42M7NB2 and B0B42LH62Y) sell FRONTLINE-branded merchandise. The rest sell products under the Beaphar brand.

Observations:

All the affected listings have "Pet Bazaar" listed in the brand column, despite selling products from different brands (FRONTLINE and Beaphar).

The real trademark owner of Pet Bazaar appears unrelated to both FRONTLINE and Beaphar brands.

And this company remains active on these listings, suggesting potential misuse or manipulation to remove competition.

Key Concerns and Questions:

Notice Validity:

How did I receive a Trademark Text Misuse notice for listings where the FRONTLINE trademark is not directly or indirectly mentioned?

Could the issue stem from misbranding in the "brand" column of these listings?

Appeal Process:

If Amazon requests a Letter of Authorization or invoices for the affected listings, we can only provide documents for Beaphar products (the actual goods sold).

How should we appeal this notice, given the listings mistakenly associate with the FRONTLINE trademark or "Pet Bazaar"?

Amazon’s Role in Corrections:

As we are not the creators of these listings, we cannot make corrections to the brand column. Can Amazon proactively update the brand column to reflect the accurate trademark owner (FRONTLINE or Beaphar)?

I believe this situation may involve deliberate misbranding by the listing creator to exploit trademarks and eliminate competition. Any advice on how to approach this matter effectively, particularly with Amazon support, would be immensely helpful.

Thank you for your assistance!

40 views
6 replies
Tags:Account Health, Deactivated, Materially different products, Product authenticity
00
Reply
6 replies
user profile
Seller_k2X0L9mVRT0pW

your third post where you haven’t tagged the mods correctly.

20
user profile
Seller_ZJhFeE3tNKzfh

You are probably right that Pet Bazaar have reported you and it is likely a case of Brand Registry misuse.

It is very difficult to get amazon support to understand this.

Again, did you actually check the barcode on the product and look this up before listing?

As it stands, amazon see you have listed on a listing branded Pet Bazaar.

00
user profile
Seller_ZVAz3d5lZuGid

You do not need to open three separate threads for the same issue - technically against forum guidelines -. Once you tag the mods correctly, they will probably close the duplicate threads.

10
user profile
Seller_3NCHziIdLTgWV

@Angie_Amazon @Winston_Amazon@Simon_Amazon@Abella_AMZ@Julia_Amazon@Sakura_Amazon_@Roberto_Amazon

00
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity