Policy Contradiction or Am I Just Crazy?

Guidelines are 100% of item price is materially different on restocking fee guidelines. But SAFE-T claim only says 50%. So if a return falls outside RFS, we can do 100%, but if RFS, we only get 50% back? So a buyer orders a lawn mower and returns a book, only 50% through SAFE-T claim?

I feel like in 20 years we'll see a documentary on Amazon and part of it will be how they recharged buyers in this instance and only credit sellers 50% back, pocketing the rest. Wouldn't surprise me.