Unfair A-to-z Claim Outcome

Countries

Read only
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Egypt
France
Germany
India
Italy
Japan
Mexico
Netherlands
Poland
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Spain
Sweden
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
United States
imgSign in
user profile
Seller_QjYfjZwWH8D0l

Unfair A-to-z Claim Outcome

@Joey_Amazon @Danny_Amazon

Order #112-9559305-2095444.

The buyer falsely claimed that we sent the wrong item because it was "too small." We sent the exact item shown on the product page.

When she returned the item, I did not immediately issue a refund. I wanted to preserve my right to file a SAFE-T Claim for the return shipping, as she had misrepresented the reason for the return. I knew that if I initiated the refund, I would be unable to file a SAFE-T Claim. Typically, Amazon automatically issues refunds if the seller doesn't do so within about 48 hours of the return scan.

However, Amazon didn't automatically issue a refund, and the buyer filed an A-to-z claim, once again falsely claiming that we sent the wrong item. Amazon ruled in her favor.

I appealed, explaining that the buyer falsified the return reason and that Amazon's policy in the past has been to automatically issue refunds if I didn't do so within 48 hours of the return scan.

My appeal was denied, and it cannot be reopened.

I filed a return policy abuse claim since the buyer falsely claimed we sent the wrong item, but I realize that won't help my appeal. Hopefully, it will flag a manipulative buyer.

The buyer should have been charged for the return shipping, as she falsely claimed we sent the wrong item. Additionally, I should not have been penalized for not issuing a refund, as Amazon has always done so automatically. In fact, moderators have sometimes advised sellers not to initiate a refund in cases where the seller wants to file a SAFE-T Claim. At the very least, I feel my metrics shouldn't be hit because the buyer's claim was verifiably false (photos of her return were included in the appeal).

I hope a mod can help. Thank you.

124 views
7 replies
Tags:A to Z Claims, SAFE-T
50
Reply
7 replies
user profile
Seller_Sram36TnVt73c

The buyer must already be on Amazon's radar or they would have refunded right when she dropped the return in the mail.

10
user profile
Seller_zGoDlPZLneGhF

I concur with @Seller_Sram36TnVt73c- this sounds like it should have been refunded on first scan. I have a few questions.

Was the item over $100?

Did Amazon send the buyer a prepaid return label or did you have to authorize the return and manually provide a return label?

Unfortunatley this is the name of the game on Amazon. Buyers will lie in order to ensure their return is free, there is very little you can do about it.

10
user profile
Seller_QjYfjZwWH8D0l

@Tatiana_Amazon @Quincy_Amazon @KJ_Amazon @Topher_Amazon @Roberto_Amazon

10
Follow this discussion to be notified of new activity