Seller Forums
img
img

Browse discussions

Update your preferences for improved recommendations
user profile
Seller_djdGAP7Vi4R80
user profile
Seller_A5QUfTZ8Bt3hf
user profile
Seller_IwiWFjOuuHSZi
user profile
Seller_speOhum7Zimbj
user profile
Seller_NbTYawTheQ9qg
user profile
Seller_d8dW6Gldc2pX7
user profile
Seller_J2H5GprhaORbt
Sort by
RecommendedLatest activityRecently createdMost viewedMost voted
Filters
Date/timeAll TimePast dayPast weekPast monthPast 3 monthsPast yearDate range
Quick filters
Discussions
Categories
Tags

Browse discussions

Update your preferences for improved recommendations
user profile
Seller_djdGAP7Vi4R80
user profile

@Seller_XUNeUuvrQDpgP@Seller_GEZPMc4CeQfh6@Seller_Huz6FT08OxHAR@Seller_hnDMgUKxMh1V4@Seller_Udi0JNbTrsmUV@Seller_mIRnuhdx7l5sN

Case ID : 11654640052

So, I sold a valuable Lego Set on Amazon in Mid August through FBA, which the seller returned to Amazon 4 days later. It left Amazon as Brand New and was returned as Used - Poor (unsellable). A return request was made to return the item to me, which Amazon cancelled nearly a month later and I had to raise a new Return Request. The item I finally received back yesterday was missing all the mini-figures, the sticker sheet and, out of the 24 bags that were originally in the set, only 16 were returned and most of those have been opened, anything of any value removed and then heat sealed back up. In all, about £500.00 worth of parts have been removed.

Obviously, I have raised a complaint with Amazon but, get this, since the item was sold, Amazon have decided they no longer sell the set and removed it from their website on 16/09/25 - about a month after the item was purchased and returned to them and whilst awaiting return of the item under the original return request. So now I am being told that, because the item is not allowed to be sold on their site, they are unable to process reimbursements as it is a prohibited item!

I'm not sure why they suddenly decided the set couldn't be sold on their site but apparetly it was due to safety and/or non-compliance issues - it's a Lego set so I'm sure it shouldn't have any issues anyway - but that's beside the point as this was decided nearly a month after the item was sold on their site!

This basically means the buyer can continue to rip of vendors on Amazon and Amazon can't be bothered to even look into this or even look to see whether the buyer has repeatedly ordered expensive Lego sets and then returned then a few days later as "damaged".

I'd appreciate anyone else who have had similar issues to this letting me know if anything was ever resolved.

9 votes
0 votes
805 views
17 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_A5QUfTZ8Bt3hf
user profile
Deeply frustrated by Amazon's behaviour
by Seller_A5QUfTZ8Bt3hf
Amazon replied

Dear sellers,

I am writing to you hoping you can help me with this very frustrating situation regarding the case ID 11616470452. Can someone tag the moderators, please? For some reasons, I am unable to do it.

At the time of creating the listing of a new product, Amazon asked me to present all the safety documents, which I have done. After several attempts, THE PRODUCT WAS ACCEPTED and I was given a green light.

I therefore shipped the product and the product arrived at the warehouse. After a couple of weeks I noticed that the product was not available for sale, so I contacted Seller Support, who told me (only after I contacted them) that I had to present safety documents again, DESPITE THE FACT THAT I ALREADY PRESENTED THEM before shipping the product.

When I submitted the same document, Amazon rejected it, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE SAME DOCUMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED. 

Furthermore, I was told that if the right document wasn't presented within 14 days the inventory will be eliminated, which I find absolutely unfair, unethical and disrespectful towards someone who has always respected Amazon rules. 

I kindly request to review this case as soon as possible, because I am deeply frustrated by Amazon's behaviour. 

Kind regards

Alessandro

5 votes
0 votes
562 views
6 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_IwiWFjOuuHSZi
user profile
200k of stock stuck 'in transit'
by Seller_IwiWFjOuuHSZi
Amazon replied

I delivered 21 Pallets, 11038 units of goods to XLB1, diverted from original distribution centre BHX4, for Black Friday stock on the 16th October, 5 weeks later.

The shipment is still in transit. My shipment has not updated to show the new delivery destination. I have a POD as I used amazon freight for the FTL load. I am very worried as my best selling lines do not have enough stock in FBA currently to supply my Black Friday deals.

It’s over 200k of sales revenue. I do have SAS service. I have opened a support case and chasing with my SAS account manager. I feel lost as no one is updating me with news of when my stock will be received.

Case id - 11668786342

FBA shipment - FBA15KXMSK01

2 votes
0 votes
231 views
2 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_speOhum7Zimbj
user profile
Sick of amazon employees stealing in Warehouse
by Seller_speOhum7Zimbj
Amazon replied

my freightforwarder sends me the receipts that amazon has received the product with no of item sent.

Can even see in amazon shipments 200 units received but under investigation, later on in stage I see only 156. How on earth is that possible?

Anyone else going through the same?

7 votes
1 vote
928 views
7 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_NbTYawTheQ9qg
user profile

Hi fellow sellers and Amazon Support,

I'm reaching out here out of sheer desperation and hope that someone from the community or Amazon support team can guide me or escalate this matter further.

🟠 Issue Summary:

We are being charged extremely high reservation/storage fees, specifically:

$26,950 charged in September — despite using only 19% of our total allocated inventory space (approx. 8,061.79 of 42,267.93 cubic feet).

We believe we were misled or unclear about how reservation fees are applied — especially when capacity goes unused.

We now want to cancel the granted capacity for November and December but are being told it’s not possible.

🔵 What We’ve Tried So Far:

Spoke with Amazon Seller Support (detailed chat transcript with two agents: Punnya and Akash Ruther M).

We were told:

Once storage capacity is granted, it cannot be canceled except in "specific circumstances".

However, those “specific circumstances” were not clearly defined.

We also tried using Capacity Manager, but the option to cancel is either grayed out or unavailable.

We enabled Auto-Cancellation, but it doesn’t seem to apply for November & December since capacity has already been granted.

We have tried multiple times to request cancellation — no resolution so far.

🔴 Our Concerns:

We are a small business and cannot afford to pay $25K+ each month for capacity we don’t need and haven’t used.

There’s no clear visibility into how performance credits are calculated or applied to offset these reservation fees.

We are unable to access September's performance metrics in Capacity Manager to even validate our usage.

We feel trapped — this situation is financially devastating and is pushing us to consider shutting down operations altogether.

🔍 What We Need Help With:

Has any other seller successfully canceled granted capacity for future months (especially after the 15th of the prior month)?

Can someone from Amazon clarify why there’s no manual override for granted storage, even when a seller is not using it and requests cancellation well in advance?

Is there any escalation path within Amazon to raise this issue to senior management or a policy team?

Why are unused granted capacities not automatically adjusted or canceled if no actual inventory has been sent?

📸 Supporting Data:

September usage: Only 19% of space used.

Fee charged: $26,950.

No visibility into September performance score.

Multiple screenshots and case ID: 18645128291 (already shared with Amazon support).

🧩 Final Note:

We really hope someone from Amazon is reading this and understands the immense financial pressure this situation is creating for us. A single policy limitation — with no manual exception process — can truly break small businesses. We need flexibility, transparency, and support.

Please — if you’ve been in a similar situation or know someone who resolved this, do share your advice.

Thank you. 🙏

3 votes
0 votes
615 views
7 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_d8dW6Gldc2pX7
user profile

Dear Sellers,

I am formally considering initiating legal proceedings against Amazon UK concerning their FBA Lost and Damaged Inventory Reimbursement Policy, specifically the handling of sourcing cost reimbursements.

Background:

Under the current policy:

Amazon reimburses lost or damaged inventory based solely on sourcing cost, explicitly excluding shipping, handling, customs duties, preparation costs, and lost profits.

Amazon reserves unilateral discretion to reject seller-submitted sourcing costs in favor of its internal estimates, without requiring supporting documentation or justification.

Amazon retains the right to dispose of or resell inventory after reimbursement, even where the item was reimbursed at a value significantly below its actual cost.

A per-unit cap of £2,000 applies, irrespective of the actual economic loss or incurred costs.

Legal Concerns:

I believe these practices may constitute:

Unfair contract terms under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and/or the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, as the terms impose a significant imbalance to the seller’s detriment and are non-negotiable.

Breach of contract, as Amazon fails to fully compensate sellers for losses incurred while goods are in Amazon’s custody.

Unjust enrichment, given Amazon’s ability to profit from reimbursed inventory sold at below its actual value.

Potential violations of UK common law principles on remedies for loss and damages, as sellers are not restored to the position they would have been in absent the loss.

Request for Feedback:

I am seeking input from other sellers who have experienced similar issues with Amazon’s sourcing cost policy. Your experiences, evidence, or documentation will be considered as supporting evidence of systemic unfairness in the policy, which I intend to present as part of a legal claim in UK courts.

Any contribution you can provide will be invaluable in demonstrating the widespread impact and potential illegality of this policy.

Thank you for your time and cooperation.

KInd Regards,

JD

20 votes
2 votes
618 views
6 replies
Latest activity
user profile
Seller_J2H5GprhaORbt
user profile
Seller Support . I dread contacting them
by Seller_J2H5GprhaORbt

Every time I contact Seller support ,

I am always made to go around in circles until I give up

it has got to the point , where I no longer wish to contact them and if i do

I am dreading reading their reply

51 votes
0 votes
970 views
20 replies
Latest activity