Subject: Confirmation of Receiving Issue at FC LPL2 Hello Julia, Could you please confirm whether there was a receiving issue at FC LPL2 in Liverpool, UK, last week? The representative from DSV carrier did not request an appointment on the carrier central platform for our shipment, which has a delivery window from December 3 to 9. She insisted to us that the LPL2 service was temporarily suspended due to shipment congestion. The source of this information was the Culina Group, with TPN carrier being one of their companies. As of December 10, LPL2 is still listed on their records, as shown in the attached file. Could you also comment on the accuracy of their list? Thank you.

Thank you.

I'm not one to moan on here, especially since Amazon generally do not care, you're just a whisper in the wind, and one of MANY, who go through hell with them. I've sold on Amazon for almost 2 years, i've paid them almost £1million pound in their fees. I've now been asked for my suppliers supplier information for 3 brand approval requests, yes i've seen it all before, - but I've had various invoices approved from this supplier in the past, next thing my supplier contacted me to advise Amazon have contacted them to purchase directly, and also to gain their supplier information.

The whole process is backwards, they require an invoice to request approval - so you have to physically buy and own the stock and get invoiced. Yet they point and laugh when they reject you once you physically hold it, and most of the time can't return it.

It's a complete abuse of Power, and they've already been taken to court over this! Yet they are STILL here doing the same thing. Requesting our Suppliers, Supplier information - for their own gain!!

We work with a distributor that has been established for 30 years, beyond when Amazon was formed, one of the most authentic, genuine businesses in existence. RARELY ANYBODY, is ever going to be able to gain their suppliers supplier information. WHO WOULD DO THAT?

That's some of the most safeguarded information in the industry, it's a businesses most sensitive information surely! Yet big bully Amazon throw their weight around, trying to gain all the information constantly for their own advantage. Masking it with -" we want to make sure goods are authentic" - Yeah yeah we've heard it all before Amazon, we get it.

One day, some how some where, it's going to come crashing down on them. No company can bully the entire market, their sellers, and abuse their power for this long and get away with it forever.

One good thing? -> It sure ignites that fire in your belly to start looking elsewhere from this increasingly dreadful place. Once loved this and all it offered, i've never felt more deflated and stressed.

I explained to amazon they were putting their business name instead of the actual brand name which is on the shoes but amazon seems to think this is ok and then no one else can link to the listing.

Hello,

We have GPSR Certificate and also have Responsible person contact details. Now we have filled details in listing which were showing in compliance. But all the listing are still showing in compliances. it is not removed from compliances even after 10 days of filling manufacturer and responsible person contact details. It is showing green tick or approved from Amazon but still showing in compliances. What should we have to do. Please guide us. Our 2600 Listings are at the risk of removal overnight. Please suggest.

I agree with everything you said...Amazon (for all their might & clout) have made the implementation of this a total nightmare...their interface sucks beyond belief (stuff showing 'Authorised'...yet still in the 'at threat' in their dedicated screen etc!)

I bit the bullet and manually clicked on my 170 ASIN x 7 EU sites! (worse still, multiplied by 3 in some instances ....'Mfr contact' then 'RP contact' & finally the Safety doc; (where required) ...that's about 2,500 clicks/edits/submissions for a mere 160 ASINs that I sell!)

Even though I did this a week ago for most, about 40 ASINs are still showing 'at threat' ...laughabale really.